History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Scott
210 A.3d 359
Pa. Super. Ct.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • On Feb 1, 2017, Philadelphia officers stopped Travis Scott for a faulty center brake light; he was sole occupant and car was registered to his mother.
  • Officer Kerr smelled a strong odor of recently burnt marijuana and saw smoke; he observed Scott place a blunt in the center console.
  • Officers ordered Scott out, patted him down (found nothing), placed him in the patrol car (not handcuffed), and searched the passenger compartment without consent.
  • In the passenger area they recovered the blunt, a jar with marijuana, and a ski mask; the odor of burnt marijuana continued to permeate the car.
  • Officers then searched the locked trunk and found a loaded .38 revolver wrapped in clothing. Scott moved to suppress the firearm; the trial court granted the motion.
  • Commonwealth appealed arguing federal automobile-exception law (as adopted in Commonwealth v. Gary) permitted a trunk search once probable cause existed to search the vehicle.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Commonwealth) Defendant's Argument (Scott) Held
Whether officers had probable cause to search the trunk after finding burnt marijuana and items in passenger compartment Probable cause to search the vehicle for drugs existed (odor + recovered blunt and jar), and under the automobile exception officers may search any area where contraband may be hidden, including the trunk The search exceeded probable cause: odor of burnt marijuana and marijuana found in passenger compartment did not create fair probability of additional contraband in trunk Trial court (affirmed): No probable cause to search trunk; suppression of firearm affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Gary, 91 A.3d 102 (Pa. 2014) (Pennsylvania adopts federal automobile-exception framework; probable cause alone permits warrantless vehicle searches)
  • United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (U.S. 1982) (scope of warrantless vehicle search is defined by object of search and places it may be found)
  • Commonwealth v. Stoner, 344 A.2d 633 (Pa. Super. 1975) (odor of marijuana can establish probable cause when officer is lawfully positioned)
  • Commonwealth v. Manuel, 194 A.3d 1076 (Pa. Super. 2018) (probable cause requires a fair probability that contraband will be found in particular place)
  • Commonwealth v. Bailey, 545 A.2d 942 (Pa. Super. 1988) (probable cause to search a vehicle can extend to the trunk when officer has facts creating a fair probability contraband is there)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Scott
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 10, 2019
Citation: 210 A.3d 359
Docket Number: 3994 EDA 2017
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.