History
  • No items yet
midpage
936 N.E.2d 436
Mass. App. Ct.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Juan Santos Quinones was convicted as a joint venturer of armed robbery while masked, assault and battery, and assault by means of a dangerous weapon after a nighttime Cumberland Farms robbery and related events.
  • Lebrón and Casiano planned the robbery on Quinones’ porch, with Lebrón to enter with a knife; Casiano supplied masks and a knife.
  • Casiano and Lebrón prepared with modified sweaters/masks; Quinones was present when they dressed and later acted as lookout.
  • The trio approached Cumberland Farms; Casiano carried a gun and Lebrón was to assist; a lookout role was filled by Quinones near the scene.
  • Casiano robbed the store’s employee and another employee; cash was taken; a pennies trail led from the store to Quinones’ house, aiding investigation.
  • Law enforcement recovered clothing matching the robbers, cash trays, pennies, a note, and a BB gun at Quinones’ residence, tying him to the crime.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was there sufficient evidence Quinones knew the coventurers would be armed and masked? Commonwealth: knowledge inferred from planning and accomplice actions. Quinones: insufficient proof of knowledge about weapons and masking. Yes; evidence showed planning, role distribution, and actions suggesting knowledge of weapons and masks.
Did the Commonwealth unlawfully admit prior bad act evidence about pennies and piggy bank money? Commonwealth: evidence admissible for purposes other than character to some extent. Quinones: improper character evidence; prejudicial. No substantial risk of miscarriage of justice; evidence did not influence verdict given strong other proof.

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Latimore, 378 Mass. 671 (Mass. 1979) (standard for sufficiency review, rational jury could find guilty beyond reasonable doubt)
  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. 1979) (establishes standard for reviewing sufficiency of evidence)
  • Commonwealth v. Ferguson, 365 Mass. 1 (Mass. 1974) (knowledge of coventurers may be inferred from common venture and likelihood of need to use weapons)
  • Commonwealth v. Leach, 73 Mass. App. Ct. 758 (Mass. App. Ct. 2009) (knowledge may be inferred from planning and actions leading to robbery)
  • Commonwealth v. Netto, 438 Mass. 686 (Mass. 2003) (sufficient evidence of knowledge where coventurers coordinated planning)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Quinones
Court Name: Massachusetts Appeals Court
Date Published: Nov 8, 2010
Citations: 936 N.E.2d 436; 2010 Mass. App. LEXIS 1415; 78 Mass. App. Ct. 215; No. 09-P-435
Docket Number: No. 09-P-435
Court Abbreviation: Mass. App. Ct.
Log In