Commonwealth v. Porges
460 Mass. 525
| Mass. | 2011Background
- Defendant allegedly committed rape of a child with force and indecent assault and battery on a child under 14 before turning 14.
- Apprehension occurred after the defendant had reached age 18.
- Juvenile Court transferred the case to Superior Court under G. L. c. 119, § 72A, after finding probable cause and public-interest entitlement to try the offenses in criminal court.
- Indictments enjoined six counts of rape of a child with force and two counts of indecent assault and battery on a child under 14.
- Defendant moved to dismiss for lack of Superior Court subject-matter jurisdiction over offenses allegedly committed before age 14.
- Question presented: whether § 72A provides jurisdiction for trial in the Superior Court when the offense occurred before 14 but was not apprehended until after 18.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Superior Court has jurisdiction under §72A for offenses committed before age 14 and apprehended after age 18. | Commonwealth argues jurisdiction exists if §72A conditions are met. | Defendant contends no jurisdiction under §72A for pre-14 offenses when apprehended after 18. | Yes; jurisdiction exists under §72A if delinquency is filed and public-interest transfer approved. |
Key Cases Cited
- Commonwealth v. A Juvenile, 407 Mass. 550 (1990) (addressed gaps in pre-14 offenses adjudicated after 18)
- Commonwealth v. Colturi, 448 Mass. 809 (2007) (statutory amendments interpreted with legislative intent)
- Commonwealth v. Callahan, 440 Mass. 436 (2003) (statutory construction guiding juvenile-to-criminal transition)
- Kenniston v. Department of Youth Servs., 453 Mass. 179 (2009) (when amending statute, legislature aware of prior case law)
- Metcalf v. Commonwealth, 338 Mass. 648 (1959) (gap-filling concerns in delinquency statutes)
- D’Urbano v. Commonwealth, 345 Mass. 466 (1963) (early interpretation of delinquency jurisdiction gaps)
