History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Parenteau
460 Mass. 1
| Mass. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Parenteau pled guilty to OUI in 2007; license revoked for ten years, though he contends two-year suspension per plea.
  • In 2009, police stopped him after learning his license was revoked; he was arrested for operating after revocation.
  • Commonwealth introduced a registry certificate dated July 24, 2009 stating mail of notice on May 2, 2007 to Celebration Circle, Chicopee; no registry witness testimony.
  • Parenteau testified he never received notice of ten-year revocation and believed his license had been revoked for two years; mail addressed as above.
  • The trial court admitted the certificate; defense moved in limine; trial proceeded with verdict of guilty and sentence imposed.
  • The court reversed, set aside the verdict, and remanded for further proceedings due to confrontation violation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the registry certificate violated confrontation rights Commonwealth argues valid notice proof via certificate Parenteau challenges testimonial nature; lacks cross-examination Yes; violated confrontation rights
Whether the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt Certificate supported all elements of guilt Without certificate, element proof insufficient No; not harmless beyond reasonable doubt
Whether the registry certificate is testimonial Certificate is admissible business record evidence Certificate is testimonial and protected Testimonial; inadmissible without registry witness
Whether the certificate was properly treated as a business record Notice was a registry business record No contemporaneous record; certificate created for trial Not a proper non-testimonial business record

Key Cases Cited

  • Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (U.S. 2004) (core confrontation-right framework for testimonial statements)
  • Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 129 S. Ct. 2527 (U.S. 2009) (certificates of analysis are testimonial affidavits)
  • Commonwealth v. Crosscup, 369 Mass. 228 (Mass. 1975) (prima facie evidence of mailed notice; defendant may contest receipt)
  • Commonwealth v. Koney, 421 Mass. 295 (Mass. 1995) (proper mailing as prima facie proof of notice)
  • White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. 346 (U.S. 1992) (testimony definitions and testimonial statements inquiry)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Parenteau
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Jun 10, 2011
Citation: 460 Mass. 1
Docket Number: SJC-10763
Court Abbreviation: Mass.