Commonwealth v. Palmer
145 A.3d 170
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2016Background
- On March 4, 2014, Detective Caterino stopped a maroon Pontiac after recognizing the driver and observing a passenger try to shield his face; the driver had no valid license.
- The vehicle stopped in an illegal parking spot on the roadway and none of the occupants (including Palmer, a rear-seat passenger) had valid licenses.
- Detective Caterino called for a tow because the car could not lawfully remain where it was and could not be moved by any occupant.
- While ordering occupants out so the car could be towed, Caterino observed Palmer behave nervously, repeatedly ignore directions, and reach toward his person; the officer had prior knowledge linking Palmer to firearm investigations.
- Caterino conducted a frisk, felt bundled heroin on Palmer’s lower left leg, then found a firearm on his right thigh during a subsequent search; Palmer was charged with firearm and drug offenses.
- Palmer moved to suppress the evidence arguing the traffic stop had concluded before he was ordered out and frisked; the trial court denied suppression and the Superior Court affirmed the conviction and sentence.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether officers lawfully ordered Palmer out of the car and frisked him after a traffic stop | Palmer: the traffic stop had ended before he was ordered out, so any frisk required separate reasonable suspicion and was unlawful | Commonwealth: towing the car was a task tied to the traffic stop; ordering occupants out for a tow is within the officer’s authority during the stop | The stop was ongoing because the car had to be towed; ordering Palmer out and frisking him was lawful based on the ongoing stop and his behavior |
Key Cases Cited
- Rodriguez v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1609 (U.S. 2015) (authority for seizure ends when tasks tied to the traffic infraction are completed)
- Commonwealth v. Lagenella, 83 A.3d 94 (Pa. 2013) (officer may tow vehicle when driver’s privilege is suspended and vehicle cannot remain safely in place)
- Commonwealth v. Boyd, 17 A.3d 1274 (Pa. Super. 2011) (officer may order occupants out of vehicle during valid traffic stop)
- Commonwealth v. Reppert, 814 A.2d 1196 (Pa. Super. 2002) (officer may alight occupants to protect safety; authority ends when traffic stop concludes)
- Commonwealth v. Pratt, 930 A.2d 561 (Pa. Super. 2007) (ordering occupants out valid even absent reasonable suspicion)
- Commonwealth v. Freeman, 757 A.2d 903 (Pa. Super. 2000) (stop concludes when officer has accomplished purpose and told driver free to leave)
- Commonwealth v. Parker, 619 A.2d 735 (Pa. Super. 1992) (continued detention after citation may be unlawful absent articulable suspicion)
- Commonwealth v. Jones, 988 A.2d 649 (Pa. 2010) (standard of review for suppression rulings)
