History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Morales
461 Mass. 765
Mass.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Morales was convicted of first-degree murder on three theories, armed robbery, and kidnapping.
  • Defendant timely appeals, challenging suppression rulings, ineffective assistance claims, and closing argument.
  • Police questioned Morales after a missing-person report; initial contact occurred at 40 Truman Circle, where he cooperated.
  • Morales gave three video-recorded statements (Dec 9–10) following Miranda warnings; later, bloody jeans and other forensic evidence emerged.
  • Victim’s body was found in Monson after Morales aided in locating the scene; discovery linked him to the crime.
  • Cellular telephone evidence was suppressed due to lack of warrant, while other suppressions were denied.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether statements and evidence suppression was proper Commonwealth Morales Motion to suppress denied; most evidence admissible
Voluntariness of the second and third statements Commonwealth Morales Statements voluntary beyond a reasonable doubt
Delay/arrest-related Miranda/ Rosario issues Commonwealth Morales Rosario safe harbor does not mandate suppression; waivers valid
Duty to inform about appointed counsel communications under art. 12 Commonwealth Morales McNulty error found; harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
Closing argument misstatement and ineffective assistance claims Commonwealth Morales Misstatement isolated; no reversal; sleep deprivation and intoxication instructions lacked merit

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Rosario, 422 Mass. 48 (Mass. 1996) (six-hour Rosario rule for arrest delays not applicable to voluntary questioning)
  • Commonwealth v. Mavredakis, 430 Mass. 848 (Mass. 2000) (bright-line duty to inform attorney efforts to contact; waiver burden on Commonwealth)
  • Commonwealth v. McNulty, 458 Mass. 305 (Mass. 2010) (failure to convey attorney’s substance can render waivers inoperative; harmless error analysis applied)
  • Commonwealth v. Beland, 436 Mass. 273 (Mass. 2002) (outlines article 12 versus federal rights; duty to inform on attorney contact)
  • Commonwealth v. James, 424 Mass. 770 (Mass. 1997) (voluntary intoxication not required where not debilitating)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Morales
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Apr 9, 2012
Citation: 461 Mass. 765
Court Abbreviation: Mass.