History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Micking
17 A.3d 924
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Samuel Micking was convicted in nonjury trial of two counts each of carrying an unlicensed firearm and persons not to possess firearms.
  • Police stopped Micking for a minor Motor Vehicle Code violation; he indicated his license was suspended and appeared highly nervous.
  • Officer Tamulis conducted a protective weapons search of the interior after a live-stop and recovered two loaded firearms from the glove box, one with obliterated serial number.
  • An inventory search followed, yielding no further contraband; guns were later tied to the car and the defendant, who had a prior firearm conviction, was arrested.
  • The trial court denied suppression; a panel of the Superior Court reversed on the suppression issue; en banc review was granted.
  • The court majority affirmed the convictions, holding the protective glove-box search was lawful; a dissenter would reverse on that point.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Constructive possession of firearms Micking did not have possession of weapons found in glove box. Presence in car with weapons cannot prove possession. Evidence sufficient to prove constructive possession.
Validity of protective weapons search of glove box Search of glove box was unconstitutional without exit/patdown of appellant. Long/Morris authorize protective search of areas where weapons may be placed. Search upheld as reasonable under Long and Morris.
Suppression ruling Suppression court erred in legal conclusions about the search. Suppression court properly denied suppression based on reasonable suspicion. Suppression denial affirmed; dissent would reverse on this issue.
Weight of the evidence Verdict against weight/insufficiency challenges should be considered. Weight claim is waived and repetitive of sufficiency issues. Waived and repetitive; no reversal on weight.

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Gutierrez, 969 A.2d 584 (Pa. Super. 2009) (constructive possession can be established by circumstances)
  • Commonwealth v. Morris, 537 Pa. 417 (1994) (protective searches of vehicle interiors during Terry-like stops upheld)
  • Commonwealth v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983) (protective searches of vehicle passenger compartments permissible with articulable belief of danger)
  • In re O.J., 958 A.2d 561 (Pa. Super. 2008) (protective weapons search of vehicle conducted after stop)
  • United States v. Palmer, 360 F.3d 1243 (10th Cir. 2004) (protective search of glove box supported by danger theory)
  • United States v. Holifield, 956 F.2d 665 (7th Cir. 1992) (support for protective searches including locked glove compartments)
  • Commonwealth v. Boatwright, 308 Pa. Super. 41 (1982) (presence in car with weapon not sufficient for conviction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Micking
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 10, 2011
Citation: 17 A.3d 924
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.