History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Lynn
83 A.3d 434
Pa. Super. Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Monsignor William J. Lynn was Secretary for Clergy for the Archdiocese of Philadelphia (1992–2004) and handled reports and personnel placements for priests accused of sexual misconduct.
  • Lynn received a 1992 allegation from R.F. that Rev. Edward V. Avery had sexually abused him; Avery underwent evaluation and treatment and was later placed as a hospital chaplain and permitted to reside at a parish rectory (St. Jerome’s).
  • In 1998–99, D.G., a child altar server at St. Jerome’s, was sexually abused by Avery; those abuses were not reported to the Archdiocese until 2009.
  • Lynn was criminally charged under the pre-2007 version of the Endangering the Welfare of Children statute (18 Pa.C.S. § 4304) for his role in handling Avery; jury convicted Lynn of EWOC (Avery-related), and he was sentenced to 3–6 years.
  • On appeal the Superior Court reversed: it held the pre-amended § 4304 requires that a non-parent/guardian accused be a supervisor of the endangered child (which Lynn was not), and that evidence was insufficient to establish Lynn’s accomplice liability to Avery’s EWOC offense.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether pre-2007 § 4304 covers a church official who supervised a priest but not the child victim Commonwealth: statute’s phrase “person supervising the welfare of a child” includes persons who supervise or control adults whose duties affect children (i.e., Lynn supervised priests and thus supervised welfare indirectly) Lynn: pre-amendment statute applies only to parents/guardians or those directly supervising the child; legislature’s 2007 amendment adding supervisors/employers shows pre-2007 law did not reach Lynn’s role Court: statute requires the accused (if not parent/guardian) to be a supervisor of the child; Lynn was not a supervisor of D.G. and conviction as principal was unsupported
Sufficiency of evidence for EWOC as principal (Lynn’s own conduct) Commonwealth: Lynn’s control over priest assignments and repeated mishandling of abuse cases made him responsible for children’s welfare; jury could infer he placed/kept Avery where children were endangered Lynn: he had no direct supervisory authority over children at St. Jerome’s and did not supervise D.G.; pre-amendment statute does not reach his conduct Held: evidence insufficient for principal liability because Lynn was not a supervisor of the child victim
Accomplice liability for EWOC (aiding/intent to facilitate Avery’s offense) Commonwealth: Lynn’s pattern of protecting priests/Church reputation and specific actions regarding Avery supported intent to facilitate or promote commission of EWOC Lynn: even if accomplice liability exists, record lacks proof he intended to promote or facilitate Avery’s molestation of unknown children at St. Jerome’s; no specific knowledge Avery planned to molest again Held: evidence insufficient to show Lynn intended to promote/facilitate Avery’s EWOC; accomplice theory failed
Admission of other errors (404(b), jury instructions, prosecutorial misconduct) Commonwealth: (not reached in opinion) Lynn: raised multiple trial errors Court: did not reach these claims because reversal was required on sufficiency grounds; Lynn discharged

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Mack, 359 A.2d 770 (Pa. 1976) (statute protecting children should be given broad effect and is not facially vague)
  • Commonwealth v. Halye, 719 A.2d 763 (Pa. Super. 1998) (reversal of EWOC conviction where Commonwealth failed to prove defendant was in position supervising the children)
  • Commonwealth v. Brown, 721 A.2d 1105 (Pa. Super. 1998) (distinguishing supervision element from duty element under EWOC)
  • Commonwealth v. Murphy, 844 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2004) (elements and standards for accomplice liability under Pennsylvania law)
  • Commonwealth v. Spotz, 716 A.2d 580 (Pa. 1998) (discussion of accomplice liability principles)
  • Commonwealth v. Widmer, 744 A.2d 745 (Pa. 2000) (standard of review for sufficiency claims)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Lynn
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 26, 2013
Citation: 83 A.3d 434
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.