History
  • No items yet
midpage
139 A.3d 204
Pa. Super. Ct.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Municipal Court Judge Felice Stack granted Lancit's motion to suppress evidence from a stop (lack of reasonable suspicion/probable cause).
  • The Commonwealth appealed to the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas; Judge Joan Brown reversed the suppression order on interlocutory appeal.
  • Lancit was tried and convicted in Municipal Court after the reversal and sentenced to probation.
  • Lancit filed a Writ of Certiorari in the Court of Common Pleas; Judge Thomas Street initially granted the writ and reinstated the suppression ruling, but later vacated that order on the Commonwealth's motion to reconsider.
  • Lancit appealed, arguing a Court of Common Pleas judge sitting post-trial could review and overrule another Common Pleas judge’s interlocutory appellate decision.
  • The Superior Court considered whether the Law of the Case Doctrine barred Judge Street from reversing Judge Brown’s earlier appellate decision.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a Court of Common Pleas judge sitting on certiorari could review and overrule a prior Common Pleas judge’s interlocutory appellate ruling on suppression Lancit: the post-trial judge (Street) could overrule a pre-trial judge (Brown); post-trial review has broader authority Commonwealth: Law of the Case bars one judge of coordinate jurisdiction from overruling another absent exceptional circumstances The Law of the Case barred Judge Street from revisiting Judge Brown’s appellate decision; affirming vacatur of Street’s grant of certiorari

Key Cases Cited

  • Jones v. Rivera, 866 A.2d 1148 (Pa. Super. 2005) (standard of review for law-of-the-case questions is de novo)
  • Durante v. Pennsylvania State Police, 809 A.2d 369 (Pa. 2002) (cited on standard of review)
  • Commonwealth v. Starr, 664 A.2d 1326 (Pa. 1995) (articulates three related rules of the Law of the Case Doctrine)
  • Zane v. Friends Hosp., 836 A.2d 25 (Pa. 2003) (Law of the Case serves finality, consistency, and judicial efficiency)
  • Commonwealth v. Coleman, 19 A.3d 1111 (Pa. Super. 2011) (Court of Common Pleas sits in an appellate capacity on certiorari from Municipal Court)
  • Commonwealth v. Williams, 125 A.3d 425 (Pa. Super. 2015) (a defendant cannot ask the same appellate court to overrule another judge of that court on the same issue)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Lancit
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 18, 2016
Citations: 139 A.3d 204; 2016 WL 2931322; 2016 Pa. Super. 102; 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 277; 2238 EDA 2014
Docket Number: 2238 EDA 2014
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
Log In
    Commonwealth v. Lancit, 139 A.3d 204