Commonwealth v. Keaton
623 Pa. 229
| Pa. | 2013Background
- Keaton was convicted of murder and rape in connection with multiple 1992 incidents and filed a PCRA petition for post-conviction relief.
- This Court previously remanded to determine whether Keaton invoked a Fifth Amendment right to counsel during a December 19, 1992 custodial interrogation.
- A 2012-2013 evidentiary hearing examined Keaton’s claim that he invoked counsel, which would render his January 13, 1993 statements involuntary.
- The PCRA court found the record supported that Keaton did not invoke his right to counsel on December 19, 1992, and therefore denied relief on that basis.
- On appeal, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the PCRA credibility determinations were supported by the record and Keaton’s Fifth Amendment claim failed, and any ineffective-assistance claims were meritless.
- The decision did not require addressing Shatzer because the court found no invocation of counsel on December 19, 1992.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Did Keaton invoke his right to counsel during the December 19, 1992 interrogation? | Keaton asserts invocation occurred, supported by contemporaneous conduct and corroborating testimony. | Commonwealth asserts the record supports the PCRA court’s credibility finding that no invocation occurred. | No invocation; credibility supported the PCRA finding. |
| If invocation occurred, were the January 13, 1993 statements admissible under Maryland v. Shatzer? | Invocation would render post-invocation statements involuntary unless protective factors dissented. | Record shows no invocation, so Shatzer not applicable. | Not reached; invocation not found. |
| Are Keaton’s prior counsel’s alleged deficiencies meritorious based on the invocation ruling? | Prior counsel failed to raise Fifth Amendment issues in light of invocation. | No merit; failure to raise meritless claims cannot establish ineffective assistance. | No guilt-phase relief for ineffective-assistance claims. |
Key Cases Cited
- Maryland v. Shatzer, 559 U.S. 98 (Supreme Court 2010) (14-day interval dissipates coercive effects of custody)
- Commonwealth v. Williams, 950 A.2d 294 (Pa. 2008) (standard for reviewing PCRA credibility findings)
- Commonwealth v. Moore, 860 A.2d 88 (Pa. 2004) (credibility determinations bound to record evidence)
- Sullivan v. Commonwealth, 371 A.2d 468 (Pa. 1977) (will not disturb PCRA findings if supported by the record)
- Pursell, 724 A.2d 293 (Pa. 1999) (axiom that counsel not ineffective for meritless claims)
- Thuy v. Commonwealth, 623 A.2d 327 (Pa. Super. 1993) (post-trial counsel not required to pursue meritless claims)
