History
  • No items yet
midpage
993 N.E.2d 734
Mass. App. Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Officer Baker observed a vehicle off the road with damage; the odor of alcohol was detected on Huggins; he appeared erratic and belligerent; Huggins claimed a neighbor called police but no record existed; he refused field sobriety tests and was arrested and advised of Miranda warnings; the judge denied the motion to dismiss based on totality of the scene observations; prior to trial there was a stipulation limiting suppression of the seized vehicle evidence; Massachusetts law governs probable cause determinations and pretrial procedures; the court affirms the judgment and addresses the role of probable cause determinations and the admissibility of evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Probable cause based on the scene evidence including refusal to test Huggins argues lack of probable cause due to reliance on refusal to perform tests Commonwealth contends evidence at the scene suffices for probable cause Probable cause affirmed despite potential error in relying on refusal
Judge’s role in a motion to dismiss for lack of probable cause Judge should have relied only on the complaint and written record Judge can hear an evidentiary challenge if warranted Judge should have decided on the four corners of the complaint; no evidentiary hearing allowed without consent
Effect of pretrial suppression on post-conviction challenges Suppressed evidence would affect the validity of the conviction Suppression ruling does not nullify conviction for probable cause No prejudice to conviction from pretrial suppression analysis; appeal focuses on probable cause

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Jacobsen, 419 Mass. 269 (Mass. 1995) (illegal arrest not a bar to prosecution or conviction)
  • United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 (U.S. 1980) (probable cause standards and pretrial rights)
  • Commonwealth v. DiBennadetto, 436 Mass. 310 (Mass. 2002) (probable-cause determination after issuance of complaint)
  • Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 385 Mass. 160 (Mass. 1982) (grand jury sufficiency for probable cause)
  • Commonwealth v. Bell, 83 Mass. App. Ct. 61 (Mass. App. Ct. 2013) (no right to pre-issuance probable-cause hearing absent Commonwealth consent)
  • Commonwealth v. Webster, 75 Mass. App. Ct. 247 (Mass. App. Ct. 2009) (examination of evidence beyond specific indicia of intoxication)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Huggins
Court Name: Massachusetts Appeals Court
Date Published: Aug 8, 2013
Citations: 993 N.E.2d 734; 84 Mass. App. Ct. 107; 2013 WL 4007782; 2013 Mass. App. LEXIS 126; No. 12-P-14
Docket Number: No. 12-P-14
Court Abbreviation: Mass. App. Ct.
Log In