midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
91 Va. Cir. 485
Richmond County Cir. Ct.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant convicted after a bench trial on multiple drug and firearms charges on February 2, 2012, and sentenced to seven years.
  • Convictions followed a search, seizure, and arrest prompted by a confidential informant’s tip to Detective Norton.
  • Defendant and the Commonwealth agree Detective Norton made false representations about the informant’s history and reliability; parties stipulated his actions were fraudulent by clear and convincing evidence.
  • The court considered whether Norton’s misconduct was intrinsic or extrinsic fraud and whether the convictions are void ab initio and subject to collateral attack after 21 days.
  • Detective Norton also had a documented pattern of perjury in other cases concerning informant reliability, which was unknown to Defendant and prevented impeachment or independent verification.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Detective Norton’s false testimony about the informant is intrinsic or extrinsic fraud Norton’s perjury is typical witness falsehood (intrinsic); should not void verdicts Norton’s falsehood and pattern of perjury prevented fair adjudication and impeachment (extrinsic) Court: extrinsic fraud — perjury prevented fair submission of issues to the court; convictions vacated
Whether pervasive perjury by an officer in other cases can render convictions void Perjury in other cases irrelevant to this proceeding Officer’s undisclosed pattern prevented impeachment and verification here, constituting extrinsic fraud Court: perjury in other cases contributed to extrinsic fraud because it impeded discovery and impeachment
Whether convictions are void ab initio and subject to collateral attack after 21 days Convictions should stand despite perjury Convictions are void and may be collaterally attacked because fraud was extrinsic Court: Vacated February 2, 2012 convictions and allowed collateral attack (voidable due to extrinsic fraud)

Key Cases Cited

  • Gray v. Commonwealth, 233 Va. 313, 356 S.E.2d 157 (1987) (recognizes Commonwealth’s privilege to protect identity of mere tipster informants)
  • Keener v. Commonwealth, 8 Va. App. 208, 380 S.E.2d 21 (1989) (distinguishes active participant informants from mere tipsters entitled to confidentiality)
  • Gulfstream v. Britt, 239 Va. 178, 387 S.E.2d 488 (1990) (misrepresentations that prevent fair submission of issues may constitute extrinsic fraud)
  • United States v. Fisher, 711 F.3d 460 (4th Cir. 2013) (police perjury undermines public confidence and can justify relief)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Holmes
Court Name: Richmond County Circuit Court
Date Published: Jan 26, 2016
Citations: 91 Va. Cir. 485; 2016 Va. Cir. LEXIS 20; Case Nos. CR11-F-1487-1492
Docket Number: Case Nos. CR11-F-1487-1492
Court Abbreviation: Richmond County Cir. Ct.
Log In