History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Hainesworth
82 A.3d 444
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Commonwealth appeals an order (12/19/2012) holding Hainesworth not subject to SORNA registration and ordering specific enforcement of the plea terms.
  • Hainesworth pleaded guilty (2/27/2009) to three counts statutory sexual assault, three indecent assault, one criminal use; Megan's Law offenses were withdrawn.
  • At plea, none of the pled offenses required Megan's Law registration; record confirms no registration obligation.
  • SORNA (enacted 2011, effective 2012) created new registration duties for Tier II offenses; Hainesworth was on probation when SORNA became effective.
  • Trial court found non-registration was a term of the plea bargain and thus enforceable; court declined to apply SORNA retroactively.
  • Court affirmatively held the plea term not to register was enforceable under contract-law analysis, and declined to address SORNA constitutionality.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether non-registration was a term of the plea and enforceable Commonwealth contends SORNA applies; no bargain of non-registration. Hainesworth argues plea included non-registration as a negotiated term. Yes; specific enforcement proper; non-registration was a term of the bargain.
Whether plea governs despite SORNA's retroactive application SORNA imposes new duties; retroactivity should apply. Term of plea controls; contract law governs. Enforce plea term; retroactivity not controlling.
Whether case law supports enforcing plea terms over newer statutes Commonwealth relies on Benner and related cases. Benner not controlling; plea framed to avoid Megan's Law. Enforceability supported; not controlled by Benner; contract-law approach favored.

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Fruehan, 384 Pa.Super. 156 (Pa.Super. 1989) (plea agreements enforced under contract-law standards)
  • Commonwealth v. Kroh, 654 A.2d 1168 (Pa.Super. 1995) (ambiguous plea terms construed against Commonwealth)
  • Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (Supreme Court 1971) (promises forming part of plea must be fulfilled)
  • Commonwealth v. Zuber, 466 Pa. 453 (Pa.1976) (specific enforcement when plea terms affected law governing sentence)
  • Commonwealth v. Benner, 853 A.2d 1068 (Pa.Super. 2004) (distinguishable; plea bargained for non-registration not shown as bargained term)
  • Leidig, 598 Pa. 211 (Pa. 2008) (voluntariness of pleas; not controlling here)
  • Commonwealth v. Mebane, 58 A.3d 1243 (Pa.Super. 2012) (plea-bargain enforcement as necessity of fairness)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Hainesworth
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 12, 2013
Citation: 82 A.3d 444
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.