History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Gonzalez
10 A.3d 1260
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Gonzalez was arrested in March 2006 for drug activity and possessed 52 heroin packets (1.216 g) at arrest.
  • On September 11, 2008, Gonzalez pled guilty to possession with intent to deliver heroin; a pre-sentence report noted a prior F2 burglary conviction.
  • On January 23, 2009, the trial court imposed a sentence of 2.5 to 6 years and denied RRRI minimum designation.
  • Gonzalez petitioned to modify sentence seeking RRRI eligibility; the court denied and Gonzalez appealed.
  • The issue on appeal was whether Gonzalez's prior F2 burglary could be considered history of violent behavior under RRRI, affecting eligibility; the Superior Court vacated the sentence and remanded for resentencing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether an F2 burglary qualifies as history of violent behavior for RRRI eligibility Gonzalez argues F2 burglary is not violent behavior and does not disqualify RRRI Commonwealth contends F2 burglary can reflect violent history under RRRI F2 burglary should not disqualify RRRI; vacate judgment and remand for resentencing

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Van Aulen, 952 A.2d 1183 (Pa. Super. 2008) (statutory construction review is plenary; interpret provisions together)
  • Commonwealth v. Hansley, 994 A.2d 1150 (Pa. Super. 2010) (RRRI eligibility interpreted with related statutory scheme)
  • Commonwealth v. Pruitt, 951 A.2d 307 (Pa. 2008) (burglary viewed as violent crime for certain aggravating purposes; informs burglary's violence history)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Gonzalez
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 13, 2010
Citation: 10 A.3d 1260
Docket Number: 687 EDA 2009
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.