History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. DiPadova
460 Mass. 424
| Mass. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Dipadova was convicted of first-degree murder for stabbing Nancy Carignan in her Lowell home in July 2004.
  • Defendant lived with Carignan briefly; by the time of the murder he was living nearby with his mother and had a history of serious mental illness.
  • Defendant claimed that auditory hallucinations and dissociation rendered him unable to understand or conform to the law at the time of the murder.
  • Evidence showed extensive drug use (alcohol, marijuana, cocaine) and alleged interaction between drug use and mental illness affecting behavior around the time of the killing.
  • Expert testimony split: defense (McHoul-based) argued lack of substantial capacity due to mental disease/defect; prosecution argued defendant was criminally responsible.
  • The trial court instructed on criminal responsibility with a model instruction and a controversial clause about drug use activating mental illness; the autopsy was testified to by a substitute medical examiner.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether jury instruction on criminal responsibility was proper Dipadova argues instruction misled on drug-mental illness interaction. Berry guidance required clarified knowledge requirement; instruction was flawed. Instruction flawed; reversal required
Whether substitute medical examiner's autopsy testimony violated confrontation rights Admission through substitute violated confrontation clause. Nardi controls; error raised on appeal would affect retrial. Remand for new trial makes issue moot here

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. McHoul, 352 Mass. 544 (Mass. 1967) (McHoul standard for lack of criminal responsibility)
  • Commonwealth v. Berry, 457 Mass. 602 (Mass. 2010) (instruction on intoxication and mental disease; knowledge requirement)
  • Commonwealth v. Brennan, 399 Mass. 358 (Mass. 1987) (alcohol activation of illness; knowledge of effects)
  • Commonwealth v. Angelone, 413 Mass. 82 (Mass. 1992) (activation-like interaction between substances and mental state)
  • Commonwealth v. Herd, 413 Mass. 834 (Mass. 1992) (defendant need not know illness; intoxication caused violence)
  • Commonwealth v. Shelley, 381 Mass. 340 (Mass. 1980) (drug or alcohol use and dissociative states)
  • Commonwealth v. Sheehan, 376 Mass. 765 (Mass. 1978) (intoxication not itself mental disease)
  • Commonwealth v. Nardi, 452 Mass. 379 (Mass. 2008) ( confrontation rights when autopsy expert testifies)
  • Commonwealth v. Durand, 457 Mass. 574 (Mass. 2010) (alternative approach when autopsy photographs or substitute examiner used)
  • Commonwealth v. Wright, 411 Mass. 678 (Mass. 1992) (substantial likelihood of miscarriage of justice standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. DiPadova
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Aug 22, 2011
Citation: 460 Mass. 424
Docket Number: SJC-10743
Court Abbreviation: Mass.