History
  • No items yet
midpage
982 N.E.2d 45
Mass. App. Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant charged with three counts of indecent assault and battery on a person fourteen or older; suppression of statements granted at district court level; Commonwealth sought interlocutory appeal.
  • Interrogation consisted of a four-to-seven minute non-recorded preinterview followed by a forty-three minute recorded interview in which Miranda warnings were given and waiver obtained.
  • Defendant acknowledged stepdaughter’s allegations were true while claiming memory gaps due to intoxication; later admitted to some acts but disputed memory of vaginal touching.
  • Judge found waiver voluntary but questioned voluntariness of statements given alleged coercive techniques and minimization by detective Pisano.
  • Appellate court conducted independent review of video and background facts to determine voluntariness under totality of the circumstances; reversed suppression.
  • Defendant’s statements found voluntary; suppression order reversed and case proceeds

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the Miranda waiver voluntary? Commonwealth—waiver voluntary due to informed, detailed Miranda colloquy. Defendant—preinterview not recorded potentially undermines voluntariness. Waiver voluntary; no merit to challenge based on preinterview recording.
Were the statements voluntary under totality of circumstances? Commonwealth—interview did not overbear defendant’s will. Defendant—investigative techniques, minimization, and emotional manipulation undermined will. Statements voluntary; Commonwealth met burden to show no overbearing of will.

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Novo, 442 Mass. 262 (2004) (video speaks for itself; appellate review of video accepted)
  • Commonwealth v. Magee, 423 Mass. 381 (1996) (voluntariness requires totality of circumstances beyond Miranda waiver)
  • Commonwealth v. Selby, 420 Mass. 656 (1995) (test of voluntariness includes totality of circumstances and will overborne)
  • Commonwealth v. Durand, 457 Mass. 574 (2010) (minimization and other techniques considered; factors for voluntariness)
  • Commonwealth v. O’Brian, 445 Mass. 720 (2006) (length of interrogation as a factor in voluntariness)
  • Commonwealth v. Meehan, 377 Mass. 552 (1979) (police may suggest cooperation without rendering confession involuntary)
  • Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista, 442 Mass. 423 (2004) (minimization and related techniques discussed; limited impact if not combined with false evidence)
  • Commonwealth v. Baye, 462 Mass. 246 (2012) (cooperation and perceived benefits judged against voluntariness)
  • Commonwealth v. Mandile, 397 Mass. 410 (1986) (relevance of interrogation details to voluntariness)
  • Commonwealth v. Ortiz, 435 Mass. 569 (2002) (guidance on evaluation of voluntariness in light of legal consequences)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista
Court Name: Massachusetts Appeals Court
Date Published: Jan 25, 2013
Citations: 982 N.E.2d 45; 2013 Mass. App. LEXIS 13; 83 Mass. App. Ct. 180; 2013 WL 264716; No. 11-P-1919
Docket Number: No. 11-P-1919
Court Abbreviation: Mass. App. Ct.
Log In
    Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista, 982 N.E.2d 45