Commonwealth v. Dennis
17 A.3d 297
| Pa. | 2011Background
- Dennis was convicted of first-degree murder, robbery, conspiracy, and related offenses for the Fern Rock Station shooting of Chedell Williams; the jury found one aggravating and one mitigating circumstance and the death sentence was imposed.
- Appellant raised ineffective assistance claims and Brady claims on post-conviction review; the PCRA court denied relief, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court remanded for further consideration on two issues.
- On remand, evidentiary hearings were held; the court again denied relief, finding Anissa Bane not to be a viable alibi witness and rejecting the Brady claim about the police activity sheet.
- Key defense theory centered on an alibi through Anissa Bane, who allegedly placed Appellant at his father’s home around the time of the murder; trial and appellate counsel allegedly failed to investigate or call her.
- The Commonwealth challenged Bane’s credibility and the sufficiency of the alibi, pointing to inconsistent statements and implausibilities in Bane’s testimony.
- On Brady, the Commonwealth argued the activity sheet was a summary, not a statement, and that its disclosure would not have changed the outcome given other eyewitness identifications and cross-examination of Zahra Howard.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate Anissa Bane as an alibi witness | Dennis | Commonwealth | PCRA court’s credibility findings upheld; relief denied; Bane not credible; no ineffective-assistance error |
| Whether the police activity sheet was Brady material | Dennis | Commonwealth | Brady claim rejected; materiality not shown; trial fair notwithstanding nondisclosure |
Key Cases Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (establishes the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel)
- Commonwealth v. Pierce, 515 Pa. 153, 527 A.2d 973 (Pa. 1987) (three-prong test for ineffectiveness including prejudice)
- Commonwealth v. McGill, 574 Pa. 574, 832 A.2d 1014 (Pa. 2003) (layered claim of appellate counsel ineffectiveness regarding underlying trial counsel ineffectiveness)
- Commonwealth v. Clark, 599 Pa. 204, 961 A.2d 80 (Pa. 2008) (credibility determinations by PCRA court given deference)
- Commonwealth v. Weiss, 604 Pa. 573, 986 A.2d 808 (Pa. 2009) (articulates Brady materiality standards)
- Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 115 S. Ct. 1555 (U.S. 1995) (defining materiality for suppressed evidence)
- Bagley v. Davis, 473 U.S. 667, 105 S. Ct. 3375 (U.S. 1985) (impeachment and exculpatory evidence within Brady)
- Johnson v. Commonwealth, 556 Pa. 216, 727 A.2d 1089 (Pa. 1999) (impeachment relevance of withheld evidence requires reliability impact)
- Dennis III, Commonwealth v. Dennis, 597 Pa. 159, 950 A.2d 945 (Pa. 2008) (remand and framing of issues on PCRA review)
