Commonwealth v. Carr
458 Mass. 295
Mass.2010Background
- Indicted for drug offenses after discovery of illegal drugs in Gonzaga Hall room; motions to suppress warrantless search and statements; judge suppressed evidence; Appeals Court reversed; Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court granted review to address voluntariness of consent; court affirms suppression and leaves initial entry undecided; key evidence includes replica gun, knives, marijuana, and other drugs found during search conducted after consent forms were signed.
- Officers arrived midnight after an anonymous report; room occupants were confronted, Miranda rights read to Carr; officers conducted a room search seeking weapons; defendants were given consent-to-search forms but did not sign the consent halves; Miranda waiver was signed by both.
- Consent to search was limited to signing of Miranda waiver; no intact signature on consent-to-search portions; officers obtained physical evidence during full search of the room.
- The judge found the consent was not established; there were equivocal verbal responses and coercive, police-dominant circumstances; judge also found presence of armed officers and detentions created a coercive atmosphere.
- Appellate review affirmed the suppression order; the court did not need to decide whether the initial entry was lawful given suppression based on lack of voluntary consent.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Was consent to search the room freely and voluntarily given? | Carr argued consent was not voluntary. | Commonwealth contends consent was voluntary. | No; consent not proven voluntary. |
| If consent not proven, did coercive police conduct vitiate voluntariness? | Yes, coercive factors undermined voluntariness. | No, voluntariness acceptable despite factors. | Coercive circumstances present; consent not voluntary. |
Key Cases Cited
- Commonwealth v. Rogers, 444 Mass. 234 (2005) (burden on Commonwealth to show clear, voluntary consent; ambiguity defeats consent)
- Commonwealth v. Yesilciman, 406 Mass. 736 (1990) (reasonable deference to trial judge on suppression rulings; weight of credibility for judge)
- Commonwealth v. Aguiar, 370 Mass. 490 (1976) (consent must be unfettered by coercion; more than acquiescence to authority)
- Commonwealth v. Walker, 370 Mass. 548 (1976) (factors for voluntariness include rights, coercion, and authority)
- Commonwealth v. Harmond, 376 Mass. 557 (1978) (factors in assessing voluntariness; age, intelligence, custody, etc.)
- Commonwealth v. Sanna, 424 Mass. 92 (1997) (explicit factors for consent voluntariness analysis)
