History
  • No items yet
midpage
198 A.3d 371
Pa. Super. Ct.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • In 2013 Bricker (born 1962) communicated with a 15-year-old female and engaged in sexual contact in an attic; he was convicted of unlawful contact with a minor, indecent assault (victim <16), and harassment.
  • Trial court designated Bricker an SVP and ordered lifetime SORNA registration; he was sentenced to 3½ to 7 years' imprisonment.
  • Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted limited review, vacated judgment of sentence, and remanded for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Muniz.
  • On remand the trial court resentenced Bricker to the same prison term but imposed a 25-year SORNA Subchapter H Tier II registration requirement.
  • Bricker challenged the 25‑year registration as unconstitutional/punitive and as an illegal extension beyond the statutory maximum (7 years) for the underlying offense; the trial court and Superior Court rejected relief.

Issues

Issue Bricker's Argument Commonwealth's Argument Held
Whether Subchapter H 25‑year registration is an illegal sentence because it exceeds the statutory maximum imprisonment for the underlying offense 25‑year registration is punitive under Muniz and therefore cannot exceed the statutory maximum (7 years) for the offense SORNA registration is a legislatively authorized punitive measure separate from incarceration and is not constrained by statutory maximum imprisonment Court held registration under Subchapter H (25 years) is not an illegal sentence and affirmed the registration requirement
Whether SORNA Subchapter H may be applied to offenses committed after SORNA’s effective date (Dec. 20, 2012) Subchapter H (as amended) is punitive and cannot be applied retroactively to conduct before its enactment; Bricker argued Subchapter H (Feb. 21, 2018 amendments) should not increase his duties Bricker’s offenses occurred after SORNA’s 2012 effective date so Subchapter H applies; Muniz bars retroactive application only where SORNA is applied to pre‑SORNA convictions Court held Muniz does not render the sentence illegal here because Bricker’s offenses occurred after SORNA’s effective date; Subchapter H applies

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Muniz, 640 Pa. 699, 164 A.3d 1189 (Pa. 2017) (held SORNA registration is punitive and retroactive application to pre‑SORNA convictions violates PA Constitution)
  • Commonwealth v. Butler, 173 A.3d 1212 (Pa. Super. 2017) (concluded SVP designation process under SORNA was constitutionally flawed)
  • Commonwealth v. Eisenberg, 98 A.3d 1268 (Pa. 2014) (explains legislature’s exclusive authority to define crimes, classify offenses, and fix punishments)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Bricker
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 19, 2018
Citations: 198 A.3d 371; 623 WDA 2018
Docket Number: 623 WDA 2018
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
Log In
    Commonwealth v. Bricker, 198 A.3d 371