1:22-cv-21997
S.D. Fla.Feb 4, 2025Background
- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) sued Emerson Pires, Flavio Goncalves, Joshua Nicholas, and Empires Consulting Corp. for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act stemming from a fraudulent investment scheme called EmpiresX.
- The defendants promoted and operated EmpiresX, a commodity pool promising profits through an automated trading bot (the "EX Bot") and falsely claimed funds were securely and profitably managed.
- Defendants solicited over $40 million from pool participants through various online platforms, misrepresented the registration and performance of EmpiresX, and improperly used participant funds for personal expenses.
- Empires Consulting was not registered as a commodity pool operator, nor were the individual defendants properly registered with the CFTC; they also commingled pool and personal funds in violation of regulations.
- The defendants failed to appear or respond after being properly served; default judgment was entered against them.
- The CFTC sought and the court granted, among other remedies, a permanent injunction, substantial monetary penalties, large-scale disgorgement, and a trading ban for all individual defendants.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fraud in commodity pool operation | Defendants made knowing/reckless misstatements about EmpiresX's operations and returns. | No defense presented. | Defendants liable for fraud and deceit under the Act. |
| Failure to register as associated persons | Defendants acted as associated persons of a commodity pool operator without CFTC registration. | No defense presented. | Defendants violated the registration provisions of the Act. |
| Commingling of participant and personal funds | Defendants commingled pool and other funds, violating CFTC regulations. | No defense presented. | Defendants liable for commingling in violation of regulations. |
| Appropriateness of injunctive and monetary relief | Ongoing risk and bad faith warrant permanent injunction and monetary penalties. | No defense presented. | Permanent injunction, disgorgement, and penalties granted. |
Key Cases Cited
- None cited with official reporter citations; order primarily relies on statutory and regulatory authority under the Commodity Exchange Act.
