Com. v. Wyatt, G.
1982 MDA 2015
| Pa. Super. Ct. | Oct 24, 2016Background
- In May 2013 Wyatt murdered and robbed an acquaintance; he was charged with murder, robbery, firearm offenses.
- On June 2, 2014 Wyatt entered a negotiated guilty plea to third‑degree murder, robbery, possession of a firearm prohibited, and carrying a firearm without a license.
- The court imposed an agreed aggregate sentence of 25 to 50 years. Wyatt later filed, then withdrew, a motion to withdraw his plea at a July 11, 2014 hearing.
- Wyatt filed a timely pro se PCRA petition on June 1, 2015; counsel was appointed and filed a Turner/Finley letter seeking to withdraw.
- The PCRA court issued a Rule 907 notice, denied Wyatt’s request for new counsel, and dismissed the PCRA petition without a hearing on October 13, 2015. Wyatt appealed pro se.
- On appeal the Superior Court affirmed, concluding Wyatt’s claims were waived or meritless and that no evidentiary hearing was required.
Issues
| Issue | Wyatt's Argument | Commonwealth's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether plea counsel was ineffective for allegedly advising a lower sentence (15–30 years) and causing an involuntary plea | Wyatt contends counsel told him the sentence would be 15–30 years, and that this erroneous advice induced his plea | Record shows plea colloquy and plea agreement stated 25–50 years; statements and hearing transcript contradict Wyatt; counsel presumed effective | Denied — claim waived or lacks arguable merit; plea was knowing, voluntary, and informed |
| Whether Commonwealth coerced withdrawal of motion to withdraw plea by threatening first‑degree murder charges | Wyatt claims coercion/ threat caused withdrawal and undermined plea voluntariness | Transcript shows Commonwealth had no objection to withdrawal; defense counsel informed Wyatt of possible first‑degree exposure and Wyatt affirmed his understanding | Denied — record shows no coercion; Wyatt’s statements bind him; claim lacks merit |
| Whether PCRA court erred in dismissing without an evidentiary hearing | Wyatt argues factual disputes require a hearing on plea voluntariness and counsel’s advice | PCRA court may decline a hearing where claims are patently without merit; record does not support Wyatt’s assertions | Denied — dismissal without a hearing was proper because claims are meritless |
Key Cases Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (establishes standard for ineffective assistance of counsel)
- Commonwealth v. Faulk, 21 A.3d 1196 (Pa. Super. 2011) (standard of review for PCRA dismissal)
- Commonwealth v. Miller, 102 A.3d 988 (Pa. Super. 2014) (PCRA court may dismiss without hearing if petition is patently frivolous)
- Commonwealth v. Rathfon, 899 A.2d 365 (Pa. Super. 2006) (right to effective counsel during plea process)
- Commonwealth v. Hickman, 799 A.2d 136 (Pa. Super. 2002) (ineffective assistance tied to involuntary or unknowing plea)
- Commonwealth v. Bennett, 57 A.3d 1185 (Pa. 2012) (presumption of counsel effectiveness; burden on petitioner)
- Commonwealth v. Jones, 815 A.2d 598 (Pa. 2002) (ineffectiveness test under state law)
- Commonwealth v. Pierce, 786 A.2d 203 (Pa. 2001) (three‑part ineffective assistance test)
- Commonwealth v. McCauley, 797 A.2d 920 (Pa. Super. 2001) (plea colloquy establishes voluntariness when comprehensive)
- Commonwealth v. Muhammad, 794 A.2d 378 (Pa. Super. 2002) (defendant bound by statements at plea colloquy)
- Commonwealth v. Stork, 737 A.2d 789 (Pa. Super. 1999) (cannot assert withdrawal grounds contradicting plea colloquy)
- Commonwealth v. Yager, 685 A.2d 1000 (Pa. Super. 1996) (plea need only be knowing, voluntary, and intelligent)
