History
  • No items yet
midpage
Com. v. Thomas, R.
75 EDA 2017
| Pa. Super. Ct. | Nov 28, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Ryan Thomas pled guilty (negotiated plea) to possession with intent to deliver, which carried a mandatory minimum under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 7508.
  • Alleyne v. United States was decided June 17, 2013 (holding any fact that increases mandatory minimum must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt).
  • Thomas was sentenced on October 9, 2013, to a mandatory minimum term of 60 to 120 months.
  • Thomas did not file a direct appeal; his judgment of sentence became final on December 9, 2013.
  • On October 20, 2014, Thomas filed a timely PCRA petition asserting an Alleyne-based illegality-of-sentence claim; PCRA counsel filed a Turner/Finley no-merit letter and withdrew.
  • The PCRA court issued a Rule 907 notice and ultimately denied relief on December 12, 2016; the Commonwealth and PCRA court agreed on appeal that Alleyne applies and remand for resentencing is required.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Thomas can raise an Alleyne challenge in a timely first PCRA petition Thomas: Alleyne applies because it was decided before his sentencing, so mandatory-minimum facts must be jury-found; sentence is illegal Commonwealth/PCRA court: ultimately agreed with Thomas that Alleyne applies (initial dismissal but parties and PCRA court urged vacatur on appeal) Court: Vacated judgment of sentence and remanded for resentencing under Alleyne
Whether an Alleyne claim is non-waivable and cognizable on PCRA when judgment was not final when Alleyne decided Thomas: Alleyne claim is non-waivable and may be raised first in a timely PCRA petition if judgment not final when Alleyne announced Commonwealth: conceded the same on appeal Court: Agreed; Alleyne challenge implicates sentence legality and may be raised in timely PCRA

Key Cases Cited

  • Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (U.S. 2013) (mandatory-minimum facts must be found by jury beyond reasonable doubt)
  • Commonwealth v. Ali, 112 A.3d 1210 (Pa. Super. 2015) (sentence-legality review is de novo; Alleyne challenges implicate legality)
  • Commonwealth v. Ruiz, 131 A.3d 54 (Pa. Super. 2015) (Alleyne claims are non-waivable and may be raised in a timely PCRA petition when judgment not final at Alleyne decision)
  • Commonwealth v. Mosley, 114 A.3d 1072 (Pa. Super. 2015) (invalidating 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 7508 under Alleyne and requiring resentencing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Com. v. Thomas, R.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 28, 2017
Docket Number: 75 EDA 2017
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.