History
  • No items yet
midpage
Com. v. Johnson, V.
Com. v. Johnson v. No. 3446 EDA 2015
| Pa. Super. Ct. | Aug 14, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Officer Marchetti responded to a report of a burglary in progress on the 6500 block of Linmore Avenue; dispatch described two black male suspects.
  • While en route he observed a silver Chevy Malibu parked on that block with two occupants; he initially could not tell their sex.
  • Marchetti, in uniform, backed his patrol car up to "block them in" and intended to investigate the occupants, who were not at the reported burglary address.
  • Marchetti conceded he observed no crime being committed by the vehicle occupants at the time of the stop.
  • The suppression court found the blocking was an investigative detention and concluded Marchetti lacked reasonable suspicion to justify the stop; the Commonwealth appealed. The dissenting memorandum would affirm the suppression court.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether officer had reasonable suspicion to effect an investigative detention by blocking in the parked car Officer argued presence on same block near burglary report and two occupants justified investigation Johnson argued mere presence in vicinity, without suspicious behavior or corroboration, does not support reasonable suspicion Court (dissenting) concluded there was no reasonable suspicion; suppression court properly found the detention unjustified

Key Cases Cited

  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1968) (establishes standard for investigatory stops—reasonable, articulable suspicion)
  • In re M.D., 781 A.2d 192 (Pa. Super. 2001) (reasonable suspicion must be tied to observed suspicious behavior of the person stopped)
  • Commonwealth v. Espada, 528 A.2d 968 (Pa. Super. 1987) (mere presence near recently reported crime or high-crime area insufficient for Terry stop)
  • Commonwealth v. Ayala, 791 A.2d 1202 (Pa. Super. 2002) (officer needs independent corroboration or specific facts linking suspect to criminal activity)
  • Commonwealth v. Hicks, 253 A.2d 276 (Pa. 1969) (discusses limits of investigatory detentions)
  • Commonwealth v. Ranson, 103 A.3d 73 (Pa. Super. 2014) (survey of Terry-related standards)
  • Commonwealth v. Taggart, 997 A.2d 1189 (Pa. Super. 2010) (reasonable suspicion requires articulable facts)
  • Commonwealth v. Martinez, 588 A.2d 513 (Pa. Super. 1991) (legal framework for stops and searches)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Com. v. Johnson, V.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Aug 14, 2017
Docket Number: Com. v. Johnson v. No. 3446 EDA 2015
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.