History
  • No items yet
midpage
Com. v. Hill, C.
2531 EDA 2016
| Pa. Super. Ct. | Oct 12, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Catrina Hill was convicted at a bench trial of simple assault for punching Cheri Reeder in the eye; sentenced to 15 months’ probation.
  • Court-appointed counsel filed an Anders/Santiago brief seeking permission to withdraw as counsel.
  • Counsel notified Hill of her rights and appended required materials; Hill did not file a response.
  • Counsel identified one potential issue: insufficiency of the evidence to support the simple assault conviction.
  • Trial testimony: Reeder testified Hill struck her in the eye with a closed fist; trial court credited Reeder’s testimony.
  • Appellate court reviewed the record independently and concluded the sufficiency claim was frivolous, affirmed sentence, and granted counsel leave to withdraw.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of the evidence for simple assault Commonwealth: Reeder’s testimony that Hill punched her shows intent to cause bodily injury Hill: Evidence insufficient; her version contradicts Reeder Affirmed — testimony that Hill punched Reeder was sufficient to prove intent; credibility is for the factfinder
Counsel withdrawal under Anders/Santiago Commonwealth/Counsel: Counsel complied with Anders/Santiago procedures Hill: no response filed Granted — counsel complied with withdrawal requirements; appeal frivolous

Key Cases Cited

  • Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) (requires counsel to identify appealable issues and seek permission to withdraw)
  • Commonwealth v. Santiago, 978 A.2d 349 (Pa. 2009) (Pennsylvania-specific Anders procedure)
  • Commonwealth v. Dale, 836 A.2d 150 (Pa. Super. 2003) (standard for sufficiency review)
  • Commonwealth v. Kinney, 863 A.2d 581 (Pa. Super. 2004) (appellate court will not reassess credibility)
  • Commonwealth v. Bruce, 916 A.2d 657 (Pa. Super. 2007) (verdict will not be disturbed unless evidence is so weak no fact may be drawn)
  • Commonwealth v. Klein, 795 A.2d 424 (Pa. Super. 2002) (proof of actual bodily injury not required for simple assault)
  • Commonwealth v. Richardson, 636 A.2d 1195 (Pa. Super. 1994) (punching another’s face supports intent to cause injury)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Com. v. Hill, C.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 12, 2017
Docket Number: 2531 EDA 2016
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.