Com. v. Hess, A.
Com. v. Hess, A. No. 915 EDA 2016
Pa. Super. Ct.Mar 1, 2017Background
- Appellant Andrew Robert Hess was convicted of first-degree murder for stabbing his friend Richard Parker to death at Parker’s garage during a late-night confrontation; jury returned guilty verdict and court imposed mandatory life sentence.
- Relationship context: Hess had been romantically involved with Jessica Drake; Parker later became involved with Drake, creating animosity between Hess and Parker.
- Events: On July 11, 2014, Hess went to the garage uninvited; an altercation occurred after Parker answered the door; Parker sustained multiple stab wounds including a fatal stab to the back and had defensive wounds.
- Physical evidence: Hess had blood on his clothing and an injured lip; a 12-inch serrated hunting knife used in the killing was recovered from a nearby pond.
- Hess claimed self-defense at trial, testifying Parker grabbed and strangled him and he stabbed while trying to escape; prosecution introduced evidence that Parker was naked, asleep, unarmed, and stabbed in the back as he attempted to flee.
- Post-trial: Hess filed post-sentence motions challenging sufficiency and weight of evidence and requested an involuntary manslaughter jury instruction; both were denied and Hess appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Commonwealth) | Defendant's Argument (Hess) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency to disprove self-defense | Evidence shows Hess stabbed an unarmed, sleeping Parker and thus disproves self-defense beyond reasonable doubt | Physical and forensic evidence inside garage and defensive wounds support Hess’s claim he acted in self-defense | Commonwealth met burden; evidence sufficient to disprove self-defense |
| Failure to instruct on involuntary manslaughter | No reasonable evidentiary basis for manslaughter instruction because evidence shows intentional stabbing, not recklessness or gross negligence | Trial counsel requested instruction; evidence and Hess’s denial of intent could support involuntary manslaughter verdict | Trial court did not err in refusing the instruction; instruction not supported by evidence |
Key Cases Cited
- Commonwealth v. Diggs, 949 A.2d 873 (Pa. 2008) (standard for reviewing sufficiency of the evidence)
- Commonwealth v. Mouzon, 53 A.3d 738 (Pa. 2012) (self-defense requires honest belief and objective reasonableness)
- Commonwealth v. Rivera, 983 A.2d 1211 (Pa. 2009) (Commonwealth must disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt)
- Commonwealth v. Harris, 703 A.2d 441 (Pa. 1997) (elements of self-defense)
- Commonwealth v. Brown, 911 A.2d 576 (Pa. Super. 2006) (jury charge is adequate unless it palpably misleads or omits fundamental matters)
- Commonwealth v. Patton, 936 A.2d 1170 (Pa. Super. 2007) (court should instruct only where the offense is an issue and evidence supports it)
- Commonwealth v. Hairston, 84 A.3d 657 (Pa. 2014) (involuntary manslaughter instruction requires evidence supporting reckless or grossly negligent causation)
- Commonwealth v. Smith, 513 A.2d 1371 (Pa. 1986) (inference of intent vs. negligence for manslaughter instruction)
