History
  • No items yet
midpage
Com. v. Hess, A.
Com. v. Hess, A. No. 915 EDA 2016
Pa. Super. Ct.
Mar 1, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Andrew Robert Hess was convicted of first-degree murder for stabbing his friend Richard Parker to death at Parker’s garage during a late-night confrontation; jury returned guilty verdict and court imposed mandatory life sentence.
  • Relationship context: Hess had been romantically involved with Jessica Drake; Parker later became involved with Drake, creating animosity between Hess and Parker.
  • Events: On July 11, 2014, Hess went to the garage uninvited; an altercation occurred after Parker answered the door; Parker sustained multiple stab wounds including a fatal stab to the back and had defensive wounds.
  • Physical evidence: Hess had blood on his clothing and an injured lip; a 12-inch serrated hunting knife used in the killing was recovered from a nearby pond.
  • Hess claimed self-defense at trial, testifying Parker grabbed and strangled him and he stabbed while trying to escape; prosecution introduced evidence that Parker was naked, asleep, unarmed, and stabbed in the back as he attempted to flee.
  • Post-trial: Hess filed post-sentence motions challenging sufficiency and weight of evidence and requested an involuntary manslaughter jury instruction; both were denied and Hess appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Commonwealth) Defendant's Argument (Hess) Held
Sufficiency to disprove self-defense Evidence shows Hess stabbed an unarmed, sleeping Parker and thus disproves self-defense beyond reasonable doubt Physical and forensic evidence inside garage and defensive wounds support Hess’s claim he acted in self-defense Commonwealth met burden; evidence sufficient to disprove self-defense
Failure to instruct on involuntary manslaughter No reasonable evidentiary basis for manslaughter instruction because evidence shows intentional stabbing, not recklessness or gross negligence Trial counsel requested instruction; evidence and Hess’s denial of intent could support involuntary manslaughter verdict Trial court did not err in refusing the instruction; instruction not supported by evidence

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Diggs, 949 A.2d 873 (Pa. 2008) (standard for reviewing sufficiency of the evidence)
  • Commonwealth v. Mouzon, 53 A.3d 738 (Pa. 2012) (self-defense requires honest belief and objective reasonableness)
  • Commonwealth v. Rivera, 983 A.2d 1211 (Pa. 2009) (Commonwealth must disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt)
  • Commonwealth v. Harris, 703 A.2d 441 (Pa. 1997) (elements of self-defense)
  • Commonwealth v. Brown, 911 A.2d 576 (Pa. Super. 2006) (jury charge is adequate unless it palpably misleads or omits fundamental matters)
  • Commonwealth v. Patton, 936 A.2d 1170 (Pa. Super. 2007) (court should instruct only where the offense is an issue and evidence supports it)
  • Commonwealth v. Hairston, 84 A.3d 657 (Pa. 2014) (involuntary manslaughter instruction requires evidence supporting reckless or grossly negligent causation)
  • Commonwealth v. Smith, 513 A.2d 1371 (Pa. 1986) (inference of intent vs. negligence for manslaughter instruction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Com. v. Hess, A.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 1, 2017
Docket Number: Com. v. Hess, A. No. 915 EDA 2016
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.