History
  • No items yet
midpage
Com. v. Darder, C.
Com. v. Darder, C. No. 2628 EDA 2016
| Pa. Super. Ct. | Apr 19, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Chelcie Darder was charged with retail theft (M-1) and possession of drug paraphernalia (M).
  • On January 23, 2015, Darder entered negotiated guilty pleas with an agreement: retail theft sentence “time served to 1 year” and 1 year probation on the possession count to run consecutively; fines/costs left to the court.
  • The trial court accepted the pleas as knowing, voluntary, and intelligent.
  • At a July 22, 2016 sentencing (after a missed hearing and a bench warrant), the court sentenced Darder to 31 days to 12 months on retail theft (credit for 31 days served) and 12 months probation consecutive on possession; immediate parole conditioned on signing parole conditions and providing a home plan.
  • Darder filed a timely appeal. Counsel filed an Anders brief and moved to withdraw, asserting the sole potential issue (discretionary sentencing claim) was frivolous.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court abused its discretion by imposing a harsh/excessive sentence Darder contended sentence was harsh/excessive Commonwealth/respondent argued sentence was an agreed negotiated disposition and therefore not subject to discretionary-challenge Court held claim meritless: negotiated sentence bars challenge to discretionary aspects of sentencing; plea waived such claims

Key Cases Cited

  • Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1969) (procedures for counsel seeking to withdraw when appeal is frivolous)
  • Commonwealth v. Goodwin, 928 A.2d 287 (Pa. Super. 2007) (requirements for counsel withdrawal under Anders)
  • Commonwealth v. Lilley, 978 A.2d 995 (Pa. Super. 2009) (procedural obligations when counsel seeks to withdraw)
  • Commonwealth v. Rojas, 874 A.2d 638 (Pa. Super. 2005) (standards for Anders withdrawal filings)
  • Commonwealth v. Santiago, 978 A.2d 349 (Pa. 2009) (substantive requirements for Anders brief)
  • Commonwealth v. Flowers, 113 A.3d 1246 (Pa. Super. 2015) (appellate court’s independent review after Anders compliance)
  • Commonwealth v. Reichle, 589 A.2d 1140 (Pa. Super. 1991) (guilty plea waives discretionary sentencing challenges where sentence is part of plea agreement)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Com. v. Darder, C.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 19, 2017
Docket Number: Com. v. Darder, C. No. 2628 EDA 2016
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.