History
  • No items yet
midpage
Com. v. Brown, J.
2151 EDA 2017
Pa. Super. Ct.
Jul 24, 2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Jaron Brown pled guilty to multiple counts of robbery, conspiracy, and possessing instruments of crime on December 12, 2013.
  • On April 11, 2014, the trial court sentenced Brown to concurrent 7–14 year terms on the robbery counts, concurrent 7–14 year terms on the conspiracy counts (running with robbery), and 5 years probation consecutive to the robbery sentences.
  • Brown filed a pro se PCRA petition on March 20, 2015, and an amended petition through counsel on April 7, 2016; the PCRA court denied relief on April 10, 2017.
  • Brown appealed, claiming his sentence was imposed pursuant to the mandatory minimum provisions of 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712(a) (which he contends are unconstitutional under Alleyne) and that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge that sentence.
  • The certified record included DC-300B sentencing forms showing Brown was not sentenced under a statutory mandatory minimum; the sentencing transcript was not included.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Brown was sentenced under § 9712(a) mandatory minimums Brown: Sentence imposed pursuant to § 9712(a), which is unconstitutional under Alleyne Commonwealth/PCRA court: Record (DC-300B) shows no mandatory minimum was applied Court: Brown was not subject to a § 9712(a) mandatory minimum; claim fails
Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the mandatory minimum Brown: Counsel should have raised/appealed unconstitutionality of § 9712(a) at sentencing or on direct appeal Commonwealth: Counsel cannot be ineffective for failing to raise a meritless claim Court: Ineffectiveness claim fails because the underlying claim lacked arguable merit
Whether PCRA denial without a hearing was proper Brown implicitly: Relief warranted or hearing required PCRA court/Commonwealth: Record dispositive; no hearing needed Court: Denial without hearing affirmed
Procedural deficiency re: single notice of appeal disposing multiple cases Brown: filed a single notice of appeal for multiple dockets Commonwealth: Walker requires separate notices going forward; Walker applied prospectively Court: Walker not applied retroactively here; appellate review permitted

Key Cases Cited

  • Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013) (facts increasing statutory minimum must be found by a jury)
  • Commonwealth v. Ferguson, 107 A.3d 206 (Pa. Super. 2015) (held § 9712(a) unconstitutional under Alleyne)
  • Commonwealth v. Lesko, 15 A.3d 345 (Pa. 2011) (three-part ineffectiveness test and burden on defendant)
  • Commonwealth v. Steele, 961 A.2d 786 (Pa. 2008) (counsel presumed effective; appellant bears burden to prove ineffectiveness)
  • Commonwealth v. Fears, 86 A.3d 795 (Pa. 2014) (ineffectiveness and preservation principles)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Com. v. Brown, J.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 24, 2018
Docket Number: 2151 EDA 2017
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.