History
  • No items yet
midpage
Colosimo v. United States
630 F.3d 749
| 8th Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Colosimo was president/treasurer, board member, and 50% owner of C & C Distribution, which employed ~30 and leased space from C & C Realty.
  • C&C Distribution failed to file unemployment and employment tax returns for 2000–2002; IRS notices brought the liability to light.
  • Wiedner, the company’s outside accountant, initially thought a federal ID issue but later confirmed a large unpaid employment tax liability.
  • After stopping operations in 2004, the company continued paying creditors, including over $300,000 to C&C Realty, into 2005.
  • Colosimo sued the IRS for a refund of penalties; IRS counterclaimed for unpaid taxes; district court found Colosimo a responsible person and willful, awarding judgment to the IRS.
  • On appeal, Colosimo argues lack of responsibility and willfulness due to Gillaspey’s actions and that the district court misweighed facts and credibility.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Colosimo was a 'responsible person' under §6672 Colosimo lacked duty/authority due to Gillaspey Colosimo held status and authority to avoid default Yes, Colosimo was a responsible person
Whether Colosimo acted willfully in failing to pay over taxes Colosimo didn’t know of the liability until June 2004 Willfulness shown by payment to other creditors after knowledge Yes, Colosimo acted willfully
Whether knowledge of the liability before June 2004 affected responsibility or willfulness Knowledge before June 2004 is not required for responsibility Knowledge can influence willfulness; post-notice payments show willfulness Knowledge irrelevant to responsibility; willfulness proven by post-notice payments

Key Cases Cited

  • Slodov v. United States, 436 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1978) (trust funds held in trust and accountability of officers)
  • Ferguson v. United States, 484 F.3d 1068 (8th Cir. 2007) (responsible person must have status, duty and authority; willfulness defined)
  • Bart on v. United States, 988 F.2d 58 (8th Cir. 1993) (knowledge of liability irrelevant to responsible-person status)
  • Honey v. United States, 963 F.2d 1083 (8th Cir. 1992) (willfulness includes preferred-creditor payments; risk knowledge)
  • Jenson v. United States, 23 F.3d 1393 (8th Cir. 1994) (subordinate malfeasance does not relieve a responsible person)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Colosimo v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 25, 2011
Citation: 630 F.3d 749
Docket Number: 10-1593
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.