Collins v. State
308 Ga. 515
| Ga. | 2020Background
- On Jan 1, 2011, 14‑year‑old Rueben Hand was stabbed at a MARTA station and later died; surveillance video and eyewitnesses placed Collins at the scene.
- Collins was indicted for malice murder, felony murder (predicated on aggravated assault), and three aggravated assaults; jury convicted him of felony murder and the aggravated‑assault predicate; sentenced to life.
- Evidence: earlier fight in which Collins believed his phone and money were stolen; Collins accused Hand and two friends, followed them into the station, then ran up and stabbed Hand in the neck from behind.
- Collins told a friend he had “retaliated” by stabbing the boy; in a recorded police interview he said he stabbed once after a man reached into his pocket and he meant to flee, not kill.
- At trial Collins raised misidentification and lack of intent; counsel objected at the charge conference to the State’s requested ‘‘revenge for a prior wrong’’ jury instruction but did not object after the court read the final charge.
- The Georgia Supreme Court reviewed only for plain error and affirmed, holding the revenge instruction was supported by some evidence and was not an improper judicial comment.
Issues
| Issue | Collins' Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court plainly erred by giving the ‘‘revenge for a prior wrong’’ jury instruction | The instruction undermined his misidentification defense and amounted to an improper judicial comment on guilt | Some evidence supported a revenge theory; the instruction tracked the pattern charge and is legally accurate; Collins failed to preserve the objection so only plain error review applies | No plain error. Instruction was supported by some evidence, not an improper comment, and Collins did not preserve a contemporaneous objection; conviction affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (standard for sufficiency of the evidence review)
- Vega v. State, 285 Ga. 32 (2009) (deference to jury credibility determinations)
- McClure v. State, 306 Ga. 856 (2019) (slight evidence suffices to authorize a requested jury instruction)
- Smith v. State, 301 Ga. 79 (2017) (revenge instruction proper where evidence suggested vengeance motive)
- Hornbuckle v. State, 300 Ga. 750 (2017) (Georgia pattern revenge instruction is accurate statement of law)
- White v. State, 291 Ga. 7 (2012) (contemporaneous objection requirement for jury charge preservation)
- State v. Kelly, 290 Ga. 29 (2011) (preservation rules for jury charge objections)
- Rector v. State, 285 Ga. 714 (2009) (similar instruction not an improper comment on guilt)
