History
  • No items yet
midpage
285 F. Supp. 3d 73
D.C. Cir.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Cole's May 2011 FOIA request to FEMA sought WTC 1–7 raw data and related materials.
  • FEMA did not produce any documents until April 2016, years after the request and before suit.
  • NIST later advised it had 3,789 responsive pages; FEMA notified ~490,000 pages at NARA but indicated no further responsive material.
  • In 2016, Cole identified missing responsive records not produced by FEMA; discrepancies noted in productions and inventories.
  • FEMA proposed region 2 search; FEMA later said no Region 2 archive existed and that no further records would be produced.
  • March 2017: Cole moved for limited discovery; the court denied discovery as premature pending summary judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether limited discovery is warranted in this FOIA action Cole argues discovery is appropriate to probe FEMA's search. FEMA argues discovery is rare in FOIA and unwarranted before summary judgment. Denied; discovery not warranted at this stage.
Whether FEMA's search was conducted in good faith and adequately described Cole questions completeness and consistency of FEMA's search. FEMA contends affidavits support a reasonable search. Not resolved; discovery denied pending summary judgment.
Whether discovery should occur before the government moves for summary judgment Cole seeks discovery to oppose anticipated summary judgment. Discovery is ordinarily after a motion for summary judgment; premature here. Denied; may be reconsidered after government moves for summary judgment.

Key Cases Cited

  • Weisberg v. Dep't of Justice, 627 F.2d 365 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (limits on discovery; agency affidavits must be specific)
  • Murphy v. F.B.I., 490 F.Supp. 1134 (D.D.C. 1980) (discovery in FOIA cases often tied to summary judgment posture)
  • Taylor v. Babbitt, 673 F.Supp.2d 20 (D.D.C. 2009) (discovery in FOIA after government affidavits; context for timing)
  • SafeCard Servs., Inc. v. S.E.C., 926 F.2d 1197 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (standard for denying discovery when affidavits are detailed and good-faith)
  • Landmark Legal Found. v. E.P.A., 959 F.Supp.2d 175 (D.D.C. 2013) (discovery in FOIA exceptional circumstances)
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 473 F.3d 312 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (summary judgment affidavits; applicability to discovery decisions)
  • North v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 729 F.Supp.2d 74 (D.D.C. 2010) (arguments about adequacy of agency declarations in opposition to SJ)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cole v. Rochford
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jan 3, 2018
Citations: 285 F. Supp. 3d 73; Civil Action No. 15–1991 (EGS)
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 15–1991 (EGS)
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
Log In
    Cole v. Rochford, 285 F. Supp. 3d 73