History
  • No items yet
midpage
81 So. 3d 285
Miss. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Bill and Alicia married in 1999 and have one child, Izabella, diagnosed with mild autism.
  • They separated in 2008 and reached a property and custody agreement; Alicia received custody and several income-producing properties.
  • Alicia received $25,000 from Bill as part of the property settlement; the payment was to be made in installments over three years.
  • Trial in March 2010 addressed alimony, child support, life-insurance apportionment, and vehicle upkeep expenses; judgment entered May 17, 2010.
  • Chancellor awarded Alicia $570 per month alimony and split a $350,000 life-insurance policy evenly ($175,000 each).
  • Bill appealed the alimony amount, life-insurance apportionment, and a potential miscalculation of child support.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Alimony: include $25,000 property-payment in Armstrong analysis Coggins contends omission of $25,000 distorts estates for alimony. Coggins argues lump-sum payment should not affect alimony calculation. Remand for Armstrong analysis after including $25,000.
Life insurance: reallocate proceeds post-alimony remand Coggins asserts current 50/50 split may be improper if alimony changes. Alicia argues existing apportionment should stand pending remand. Remand to reconsider beneficiaries after alimony reconsideration.
Child support: allowance of rental-property losses in AGI Coggins contends rental losses should reduce AGI used for support. Alicia argues deductions for rental losses are not a proper AGI deduction. Court affirmed, no deduction for rental losses from AGI for child support.

Key Cases Cited

  • Armstrong v. Armstrong, 618 So.2d 1278 (Miss.1993) (Armstrong factors guide alimony analysis)
  • Ferguson v. Ferguson, 639 So.2d 921 (Miss.1994) (property division and alimony interplay)
  • Beazley v. Beazley, 917 So.2d 803 (Miss.Ct.App.2005) (life-insurance awards tied to alimony on remand)
  • Johnson v. Pogue, 716 So.2d 1123 (Miss.Ct.App.1998) (reconsider life-insurance when linked to alimony)
  • Nix v. Nix, 790 So.2d 198 (Miss.2001) (allowable business-expense deductions in AGI for child support)
  • Johnson v. Johnson, 650 So.2d 1281 (Miss.1994) (equitable division and alimony considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Coggins v. Coggins
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Feb 14, 2012
Citations: 81 So. 3d 285; 2012 Miss. App. LEXIS 88; 2012 WL 447560; No. 2010-CA-00959-COA
Docket Number: No. 2010-CA-00959-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.
Log In
    Coggins v. Coggins, 81 So. 3d 285