History
  • No items yet
midpage
CNX Gas Co. v. Rasnake
752 S.E.2d 865
Va.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • In 1887 Jacob and Mary Fuller conveyed “all the coal, in, upon, or underlying” a 414 1/8 acre tract to third parties; no other minerals were conveyed then.
  • In 1918 W.T. Fuller (successor) deeded a 75-acre portion to Unice Nuckles "with General Warranty" and added: “This sale is not ment [sic] to convey any coals or minerals. The same being sold and deeded to other parties heretofore.”
  • CNX, as lessee under Nuckles’ successors, produced coal‑bed methane and claimed non‑coal mineral rights under the 1918 deed; plaintiffs (Fuller successors) claimed the mineral estate.
  • Circuit court held the 1918 deed unambiguously excepted all coal and other minerals from the conveyance, awarding the mineral estate to the plaintiffs. CNX appealed.
  • The dispositive question: whether the 1918 language excepted all minerals (including non‑coal) or only those minerals (coal) previously conveyed in 1887.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Meaning of the 1918 deed language excluding “any coals or minerals. The same being sold and deeded to other parties heretofore.” The language unambiguously excepts all coal and minerals from the conveyance (plaintiffs/Fuller successors). The clause is ambiguous or is a dependent clause limiting the exception to minerals previously conveyed (CNX/Nuckles' successors). The deed is ambiguous; read as excluding only minerals previously conveyed (i.e., coal). The 1918 deed conveyed all mineral rights the grantor could convey except previously conveyed coal.

Key Cases Cited

  • Berry v. Klinger, 225 Va. 201 (defines ambiguity and supports examining multiple meanings)
  • Harris v. Scott, 179 Va. 102 (parol evidence and surrounding circumstances can resolve ambiguity)
  • Ott v. L&J Holdings, LLC, 275 Va. 182 (ambiguous deeds permit admission of parol evidence)
  • Goodson v. Capehart, 232 Va. 232 (when deed intent is uncertain, common-law rule gives effect to granting clause)
  • Bradley v. Virginia Railway & Power Co., 118 Va. 233 (exceptions in a deed are construed most favorably for the grantee)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: CNX Gas Co. v. Rasnake
Court Name: Supreme Court of Virginia
Date Published: Jan 10, 2014
Citation: 752 S.E.2d 865
Docket Number: 130306
Court Abbreviation: Va.