midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2012 Ohio 4589
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Mojsoski appealed his Cleveland Municipal Court conviction for menacing (CCO 621.07).
  • He and Elena Zladeska were married in 2009 and Macedonia nationals; they faced a divorce hearing in Cuyahoga County in 2011.
  • Before a divorce hearing on February 15, 2011, Mojsoski allegedly told Zladeska, “I’ll kill you,” while making a threatening gesture.
  • Charge stemmed from the February 15 incident; a complaint for aggravated menacing (CCO 621.06) was filed on April 11, 2011 and Mojsoski pled not guilty on June 8, 2011.
  • At trial, the jury found him guilty of the lesser offense of menacing (not aggravated menacing) and he was fined $250 plus costs on November 21, 2011.
  • On December 19, 2011, Mojsoski timely appealed raising three assignments of error.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did the trial court err in instructing on the lesser offense of menacing? City argues instruction was proper where evidence supported both offenses. Mojsoski contends the instruction lowered the required burden on serious physical harm. Yes; instruction proper if evidence supports both offenses.
Was the conviction against the manifest weight of the evidence? City asserts the jury properly weighed credibility and evidence. Mojsoski contends the verdict contradicts the weight of the evidence. No; the conviction was not against the manifest weight.
Did the trial court abuse by excluding deportation-motive testimony? State contends testimony would confuse issues and lacks probative value. Mojsoski claims deportation testimony would show Zladeska’s motivation to fabricate. No; court acted within its Evid.R. 403 discretion to exclude

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Mitchell, 53 Ohio St.3d 117 (Ohio App.3d 1988) (standard for instructing on lesser included offenses; abuse of discretion not favored)
  • State v. Adams, 62 Ohio St.2d 151 (Ohio St.2d 1980) (abuse of discretion in jury instructions; criteria for lesser included offenses)
  • Shaker Hts. v. Mosely, 113 Ohio St.3d 329 (2007-Ohio-2072) (when to instruct on lesser included offenses; substantial evidence standard)
  • State v. Shane, 63 Ohio St.3d 630 (1992) (standard on lesser included offenses and jury instructions)
  • State v. Striley, 21 Ohio App.3d 300 (1985) (recognition of lesser included offenses in aggravated vs. simple threats)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cleveland v. Mojsoski
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 4, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 4589; 97762
Docket Number: 97762
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In