History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cleary v. Sledge Properties, Inc.
2010 Ark. App. 755
Ark. Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Cleary entered a November 1989 contract with Gardner Investments for property in Drew County, with deeds to Cleary upon full payment of the price.
  • The contract was unrecorded and obligated Cleary to pay taxes and maintain insurance; Gardner would deliver a deed when paid in full.
  • Cleary reduced monthly payments from $277.53 to $175 in 1993 and later stopped paying in April 1998.
  • Gardner Investments allegedly paid real property taxes; Cleary remained in possession since 1989.
  • Gardner conveyed the property to Community Radio Network, Inc. in 2004, which then conveyed to Sledge Properties, Inc. in March 2007.
  • Cleary filed a complaint in May 2007 claiming ownership by adverse possession; Sledge counterclaimed for unlawful detainer seeking possession, rent, and fees.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Cleary’s post-breach possession was hostile to the owner Cleary argues possession became adverse after renegotiation and breach. Sledge contends continued possession under contract cannot be hostile. Cleary’s possession post-breach was not established as hostile.
Whether the 1995 amendment to 18-11-106 applied and credit for taxes Cleary was not required to prove tax payments under pre-amendment law. Sledge argues the amendment applied and Cleary failed to prove tax payments. Amendment did not vest until after hostile possession; Cleary failed to show tax payments.
Whether the contract constitutes color of title Cleary contends contract provided color of title. Sledge maintains contract did not provide color of title; purchaser under executory contract cannot adverse-possess. Court did not reach color-of-title issue because other elements failed.
Whether the contract modification negates adverse-possession claim Renegotiation or modification tolled or altered possession characterization. Modification does not support hostility to defeat ownership by adverse possession. Court held modification/renegotiation did not salvage adverse-possession claim.
Award of back rent under unlawful detainer (18-60-309) Sledge entitled to liquidated damages for unlawful detainer. Court denied damages; no discretion to refuse. Reversed and remanded to award fair rental value as damages.

Key Cases Cited

  • Mask v. State, 314 Ark. 25 (1993) (courts may control seating absent prejudice to a party)
  • Webster v. State, 284 Ark. 206 (1984) (evidence-rule seating discretion under Rule 615)
  • Schrader v. Schrader, 81 Ark.App. 343 (2003) (amendment to 18-11-106; vesting of claims)
  • Tillar v. Clayton, 76 Ark. 405 (1905) (purchaser under executory contract cannot establish hostility)
  • Cleveland v. Aldridge, 94 Ark. 51 (1910) (possession under contract affects adverse-possession status)
  • Dickson v. Sentell, 83 Ark. 385 (1907) (traditional elements of adverse possession)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cleary v. Sledge Properties, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date Published: Nov 10, 2010
Citation: 2010 Ark. App. 755
Docket Number: No. CA 09-1304
Court Abbreviation: Ark. Ct. App.