History
  • No items yet
midpage
Claudia Arroyo v. State
05-16-00802-CR
| Tex. App. | Aug 4, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Claudia Arroyo was charged with three counts of possession with intent to deliver controlled substances after police found methamphetamine, heroin, and cocaine in her trailer.
  • Juan Rojas, a Department of Homeland Security/ICE deportation officer, received a tip a deported person was manufacturing/selling narcotics at an Irving trailer home and went to investigate.
  • When Arroyo opened the front door, Rojas asked if she lived there; she retreated inside, and Rojas smelled a strong odor of marijuana emanating from the trailer.
  • Rojas notified Irving police, who obtained and executed a warrant to search the trailer and recovered the controlled substances.
  • Arroyo moved to suppress the evidence obtained in the search; the trial court denied the motion. She pleaded guilty and received deferred adjudication with ten years of community supervision.
  • On appeal, Arroyo argued Rojas’s entry onto the curtilage was an unconstitutional search under Florida v. Jardines and thus tainted the warrant-based search.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Rojas’s entry onto the curtilage to investigate constituted an unlawful Fourth Amendment search that invalidated the subsequent warrant search Arroyo: Rojas entered curtilage to investigate a crime without implied invitation so his entry was a search under Jardines and lacked probable cause State: Rojas approached to knock and speak (a conduct covered by the ordinary implied invitation); no dog sniff or investigatory device was used; any subsequent warrant was valid based on observed odor and investigation Court: Rejected Arroyo’s claim — Rojas’s conduct was an ordinary knock-and-talk within implied invitation; Jardines (involving a trained dog sniff) is distinguishable; affirmed denial of suppression

Key Cases Cited

  • Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1 (2013) (holding bringing a drug-sniffing dog to the curtilage to investigate the home was a Fourth Amendment search)
  • Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. 452 (2011) (recognizing an implied license for a visitor to approach a home and knock)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Claudia Arroyo v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Aug 4, 2017
Docket Number: 05-16-00802-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.