History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clark v. Edens
2011 OK 28
Okla.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Married Oct 10, 1998; divorced Sep 6, 2002; child M.A.C. born Jan 8, 2001 during marriage.
  • Clark seeks declaratory judgment asserting he is presumptive father under 10 O.S.2001 § 2(A)(1) despite divorce decree finding no children.
  • Edens opposes relief, citing genetic test within two years of birth showing Clark not the biological father and a divorce petition/waiver indicating no children of the marriage.
  • Trial court denied declaratory relief, ruling the divorce decree rebutted presumptions and that Clark waived by his petition.
  • Court of Civil Appeals affirmed; the Supreme Court grants certiorari, reverses, and remands for further proceedings, recognizing Clark’s entitlement to declaratory relief and equity-based enforcement of the presumption.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the decree finding no children forecloses presumptive paternity Clark: decree does not resolve rights to an undisclosed child and cannot defeat the presumption Edens: decree's no-children finding extinguishes paternity claims No; decree does not preclude presumption of paternity.
Whether Clark waived his paternity claim by filing a ‘no children’ petition Clark: waiver not effective; petition inconsistent with later claim Edens: waiver by petition precludes later assertion No; waiver not effective to bar presumption or enforce equitable relief.
Whether equity and estoppel support recognizing the presumption despite genetic test results Clark: equity estops Edens from contesting after seven years of parental relationship Edens: genetic test should rebut presumption Equity supports recognizing presumption; remand for custody/support/visitation with guardian ad Litem.

Key Cases Cited

  • Carpenter v. Carpenter, 645 P.2d 476 (Okla. 1982) (declaratory relief and equity in divorce context)
  • Cornelius v. Cornelius, 15 P.3d 528 (Okla. Civ. App. 2000) (no-children finding does not bar later paternity action)
  • Parker v. Ind. Sch. Dist. I-003 of Okmulgee County, 82 F.3d 952 (10th Cir. 1996) (public policy and nonwaivable presumptions)
  • Hoar v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 968 P.2d 1219 (Okla. 1998) (waiver/estoppel principles in litigation)
  • Harrell v. Horton, 401 P.2d 461 (Okla. 1965) (judicial estoppel concepts in prior petitions)
  • Estate of Bartlett, 680 P.2d 369 (Okla. 1984) (equity relief may address multiple issues)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. Edens
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Apr 12, 2011
Citation: 2011 OK 28
Docket Number: 108,187
Court Abbreviation: Okla.