History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clark v. Amica Mut Ins Co
22-cv-882
Vt. Super. Ct.
Apr 28, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • The case involves a traffic collision where the plaintiff, Benjamin Clark, sought underinsured motorist benefits from Amica Mutual Insurance after recovering $25,000 from a third party.
  • Clark claimed additional damages, including lost income, pain and suffering, and medical expenses.
  • The matter was tried by a jury in January 2025, with both parties presenting expert medical testimony and differing views on damages.
  • Plaintiff suggested $300,000 in damages; the jury returned a $75,000 verdict.
  • Post-judgment, Clark moved for litigation costs and prejudgment interest under Vt. R. Civ. P. 54.
  • Defendant did not object to costs but opposed prejudgment interest; the court issued an order resolving both requests.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Costs Entitled to $1,515.88 in litigation costs as prevailing party Did not oppose costs Costs granted to Clark
Prejudgment Interest – Liquidated Damages Prejudgment interest is warranted, using date of complaint and investment rate Damages not liquidated, not ascertainable pre-verdict Interest denied; damages were unliquidated
Prejudgment Interest – Tort vs. Contract Action is in contract, so interest justified Discretionary even in contract cases if damages uncertain Discretion applies; interest denied
Calculation of Interest Court may allocate interest from complaint filing Impossible to allocate between periods; all damages litigated through trial No concrete amount or period for calculation

Key Cases Cited

  • Peterson v. Chichester, 157 Vt. 548 (Vt. 1991) (trial courts have discretion in awarding costs)
  • EBWS, LLC v. Britly Corp., 181 Vt. 513 (Vt. 2007) (prejudgment interest mandatory only for liquidated or certain damages)
  • d'Arc Turcotte v. Est. of LaRose, 153 Vt. 196 (Vt. 1989) (interest mandatory for liquidated damages, discretionary for inchoate damages in personal injury)
  • Estate of Fleming v. Nicholson, 168 Vt. 495 (Vt. 1998) (purpose and calculation framework for prejudgment interest)
  • Winey v. William E. Dailey, Inc., 161 Vt. 129 (Vt. 1993) (prejudgment interest discretionary where damages are uncertain in contract or tort)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. Amica Mut Ins Co
Court Name: Vermont Superior Court
Date Published: Apr 28, 2025
Docket Number: 22-cv-882
Court Abbreviation: Vt. Super. Ct.