History
  • No items yet
midpage
City of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles Employee Relations Board
7 Cal. App. 5th 150
| Cal. Ct. App. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • DWP, a City department, challenged an ERB ruling against it regarding standby pay for MEA-represented employees.
  • MEA alleged an unfair practices charge under the ERO by the DWP’s unilateral suspension of standby-pay arrangements.
  • ERB held there was a binding past practice and ordered reinstatement of standby-pay who were affected.
  • DWP filed a petition for writ of administrative mandate in superior court within 90 days of the ERB final order.
  • MEA demurred, arguing section 3509.5 governs review of ERB decisions and requires Court of Appeal review within 30 days.
  • Superior court sustained the demurrer but allowed amendment; DWP did not amend; case dismissed; DWP timely appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Gov. Code § 3509.5 applies to ERB decisions. DWP: § 3509.5 applies only to PERB, not ERB. MEA: § 3509.5 governs all MMBA-related board decisions, including ERB. § 3509.5 does not apply to ERB decisions.
What is the proper review path for ERB decisions if § 3509.5 does not apply? Mandamus in superior court remains available to challenge ERB decisions. Court of Appeal review under § 3509.5 is required for PERB, not ERB. ERB decisions are not governed by § 3509.5; traditional mandamus/superior court review remains appropriate; remand for further proceedings.
Does Singletary control whether ERB decisions are reviewable in superior court? Singletary supports ERB exclusive initial jurisdiction and Court of Appeal review. Singletary dictates ERB review path; § 3509.5 applies to ERB decisions. Court disagrees with Singletary on § 3509.5 applicability to ERB; ERB has exclusive initial jurisdiction but does not convert to Court of Appeal review under § 3509.5.

Key Cases Cited

  • Singletary v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 18, 212 Cal.App.4th 34 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) (MMBA review and exhaustion principles; ERB exclusive initial jurisdiction (discussed))
  • Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control Dist. v. California Public Employment Relations Bd., 35 Cal.4th 1072 (Cal. 2005) (Legislative scheme for PERB and MMBA enforcement; election of review)
  • International Assn. of Fire Fighters v. Public Employment Relations Bd., 51 Cal.4th 259 (Cal. 2011) (limits of section 3509.5 review and mandamus implications)
  • County of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations Com., 56 Cal.4th 905 (Cal. 2013) (MMBA enforcement and PERB context; ERCOM ERB framework)
  • City of San Jose v. Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3, 49 Cal.4th 597 (Cal. 2010) (MMBA rights and enforcement; administrative review roles)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: City of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles Employee Relations Board
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Dec 30, 2016
Citation: 7 Cal. App. 5th 150
Docket Number: B261246
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.