437 S.W.3d 529
Tex.2014Background
- Shayn Proler, a Houston firefighter and captain, was reassigned after a 2004 incident where a coworker alleged he wouldn’t enter a burning building.
- In March 2006, Proler could not don firefighting gear, had trouble walking, and appeared disoriented at a house fire, leading to reassignment and medical evaluation.
- Proler filed an administrative grievance under a collective bargaining agreement seeking reassignment; a hearing examiner granted reassignment to fire suppression, later reversed on appeal, with further litigation in trial court.
- The trial court awarded Proler injunctive relief and substantial attorney’s fees after a disability discrimination verdict under ADA and Texas Labor Code Chapter 21.
- The court of appeals reversed some rulings but affirmed other disability-discrimination relief; the Texas Supreme Court granted review to address whether Proler had a disability or was perceived to have one.
- The Court held that Proler did not prove disability or being regarded as disabled, reversed the take-nothing judgment on disability claims, and remanded for other issues.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Did Proler have a disability under ADA/Texas law? | Proler was disabled or perceived as disabled due to depression. | There was no evidence of a disability or perceived disability. | No disability established; no substantial limitation shown. |
| Was Proler regarded as disabled by the City? | Evidence showed perception of impairment affected job status. | No evidence City perceived a mental impairment affecting major life activities. | Not established; no perception of impairment supported. |
| Did the City’s reassignments constitute disability discrimination? | Reassignments were motivated by disability/perception thereof. | Reassignments were based on specific job performance and safety concerns, not disability. | Discrimination claim cannot be sustained; record shows job-performance-based actions. |
Key Cases Cited
- Toyota Motor Corp. v. Williams, 534 S. Ct. 184 (2002) (inability to perform a broad range of work-related tasks)
- Sutton v. United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) (major life activity not substantially limited by inability to perform a single job)
- City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802 (Tex. 2005) (standard for appellate review of legal sufficiency in Texas)
- Haggar Apparel Co. v. Leal, 154 S.W.3d 98 (Tex. 2004) (definition of disability under Texas Labor Code aligned with ADA)
- Thomann v. Lakes Reg’l MHMR Ctr., 162 S.W.3d 788 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005) (qualification for other positions indicates not per se disability)
- Waffle House, Inc. v. Williams, 313 S.W.3d 796 (Tex. 2010) (consolidates federal and state disability standards in Texas)
