History
  • No items yet
midpage
City of Bismarck v. Goodwin
2022 ND 72
| N.D. | 2022
Read the full case

Background

  • In Sept. 2020 Goodwin was cited for actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence — refusal.
  • Goodwin submitted proposed jury instructions addressing elements of the offense and defenses (confusion, mistake) prior to trial.
  • The district court denied Goodwin’s requested instructions. Goodwin entered a conditional guilty plea reserving the right to appeal a specified pretrial ruling under N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2).
  • Goodwin’s counsel expressly asked the court to deny the instructions on the record to prompt appellate review and sought Supreme Court guidance on the refusal statute instructions.
  • The Supreme Court declined to review the denied-requested instructions because doing so would amount to an advisory opinion where there was no adverse determination of a pretrial motion; the court affirmed the criminal judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a conditional guilty plea permits appellate review of the district court’s denial of requested jury instructions City: Review is not appropriate because no adverse, reviewable pretrial ruling exists and review would be advisory Goodwin: He reserved the right to appellate review and sought guidance on whether his proposed instructions were legally acceptable Court: Declined review — absent an adverse determination of a pretrial motion (or overlapping reviewable ruling), the issue would be advisory; judgment affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Sackenrueter, 952 N.W.2d 82 (N.D. 2020) (declined to review denied jury instructions after conditional plea where no instructions were given)
  • State v. Hammer, 787 N.W.2d 716 (N.D. 2010) (context on limits of appellate review after conditional pleas)
  • State v. Kleppe, 800 N.W.2d 311 (N.D. 2011) (review allowed where motion in limine overlapped with challenged jury instructions)
  • State v. Schmidt, 640 N.W.2d 702 (N.D. 2002) (affirmative-defense instruction reviewable when tied to a pretrial motion)
  • State v. Trevino, 807 N.W.2d 211 (N.D. 2011) (instruction review tied to adjudication of pretrial motion concerning defenses)
  • City of Fargo v. Nikle, 924 N.W.2d 388 (N.D. 2019) (review of affirmative-defense instruction after trial where burden issue was litigated)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: City of Bismarck v. Goodwin
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 14, 2022
Citation: 2022 ND 72
Docket Number: 20210210
Court Abbreviation: N.D.