History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cid v. Erie Insurance Group
63 A.3d 787
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Cid, an Erie insured, filed a petition in Philadelphia County Nov 15, 2011 to appoint a neutral arbitrator and compel UIM arbitration.
  • Erie answered, asserting Montgomery County as proper venue under the policy.
  • Cid filed a second, identical petition on Nov 29, 2011 with service by certified mail.
  • Erie filed preliminary objections to the second petition (Dec 8, 2011) challenging venue and service.
  • The court, after a policy reference, sustained Erie’s venue objections and dismissed the petition without prejudice (Jan 18, 2012).
  • Cid’s subsequent petition was again dismissed (Feb 22, 2012) and she appealed, challenging whether Erie waived venue by not timely filing preliminary objections; the court’s ruling rested on petition practice under local rules.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Erie waived venue objection by answering first petition Cid Erie waived by not filing preliminary objections Yes, waived; but affirmed on alternative basis under Local Rule 206.1(a)
Proper procedure for petitions vs pleadings in Philadelphia** Cid Erie complied via answer under petition rules Petitions governed by Pa.R.C.P. 206.1 et seq.; no preliminary objections in petitions; defenses via answer
Effect of Local Rule 206.1(a) on waiver doctrine Cid Rule supersedes Clark/Boyce Rule controls; no waiver due to timing under petition framework

Key Cases Cited

  • Schultz v. MMI Prods., 30 A.3d 1224 (Pa.Super.2011) (abuse of discretion standard for venue rulings)
  • Sehl v. Neff, 26 A.3d 1130 (Pa.Super.2011) (abuse of discretion in civil procedure rulings)
  • Clark v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co., 410 Pa.Super. 300, 599 A.2d 1001 (Pa.Super.1991) (preliminary objections vs petition practice in venue challenges)
  • McLain v. Arneytown Trucking Co., Inc., 370 Pa.Super. 520, 536 A.2d 1388 (Pa.Super.1988) (failure to timely file preliminary objections waives improper venue)
  • Boyce v. St. Paul Property & Liability Ins. Co., 421 Pa.Super. 582, 618 A.2d 962 (Pa.Super.1992) (waiver of venue defense when objections not timely)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cid v. Erie Insurance Group
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 15, 2013
Citation: 63 A.3d 787
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.