History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chudacoff v. UNIV. MED. CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA
649 F.3d 1143
| 9th Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Chudacoff, a physician, had his UMC staff privileges suspended by the MEC; the suspension led to NPDB reporting and subsequent actions by related medical institutions.
  • UMC is a Nevada county hospital; the Clark County Board of Commissioners sits ex officio on the UMC Board with final authority over bylaws.
  • MEC and Medical Staff, per UMC Bylaws, have authority to grant/suspend privileges, with the Board retaining appellate review and policymaking authority.
  • Chudacoff sued under 42 U.S.C. §1983 alleging due process violations and sought to amend to add §1983 claims; district court previously ruled there were due process violations and no HCQIA immunity.
  • District court granted partial summary judgment: due process violation due to state-action issue unresolved; HCQIA immunity issue addressed; district court denied leave to amend.
  • On appeal, the Ninth Circuit reverses as to the individually named voting MEC doctors for state-action liability, and affirms as to other defendants; remands for proceedings consistent with the opinion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether MEC voting doctors are state actors for §1983 liability. Chudacoff argues doctors acted under color of state law. Defendants contend private actors cannot be state actors. Yes; MEC voting doctors are state actors.
Whether Kathleen Silver is liable under §1983. Silver's MEC participation makes her liable. Silver had a non-voting, passive role; not liable. No; not an integral participant.
Whether UMC, the Board, and the Medical and Dental Staff can be liable under §1983. Institutional policy or final policymaker liability exists. No evidence of policy or final policymaker participation; no Monell liability. Affirmed for these entities.
Whether leave to amend to add §1983 claims was properly denied. Amendment would not be futile; state-action facts support amendment. Amendment to add §1983 claims would be futile. Granted; leave to amend was proper.

Key Cases Cited

  • Brentwood Acad. v. Tenn. Secondary Sch. Athletic Ass'n, 531 U.S. 288 (U.S. 2001) (state action nexus, close connection between state and private actors)
  • Monell v. Dept. of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (U.S. 1978) (local government liability for official policy or custom)
  • West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (U.S. 1988) (state action when public hospital doctors act under state authority)
  • Woodbury v. McKinnon, 447 F.2d 839 (5th Cir. 1971) (public hospital operations involve state action)
  • Sutton v. Providence St. Joseph Med. Ctr., 192 F.3d 826 (9th Cir. 1999) (private hospital with state links can be state action under certain nexus)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Chudacoff v. UNIV. MED. CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 9, 2011
Citation: 649 F.3d 1143
Docket Number: 09-17558
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.