History
  • No items yet
midpage
Christopher Hall v. Germania Farm Mutual Insurance Association
07-16-00304-CV
| Tex. App. | Oct 13, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • May 2013 storm damages Hall's insured property; Germania adjusted, valued net claim around $13,000.
  • Germania tendered two checks totaling about $9,700, then ~$1,200 after adjustments; Hall rejected.
  • Hall sued Germania in 2014 for breach of contract, Prompt Pay Act, Insurance Code, and DTPA.
  • Germania demanded appraisal in Oct. 2014; appraisal concluded Feb. 12, 2016 valuing loss at $31,497.
  • Germania paid $18,566.32 on Feb. 24, 2016, with counsel conditioning payment on Hall's dismissal of suit.
  • Trial court granted summary judgment for Germania; court of appeals reversed on estoppel and extra-contractual claims and remanded.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Estoppel defense based on appraisal payment timing Hall: payment within reasonable time not proven; estoppel not established Germania: tender within reasonable time; estoppel should bar contract claims Partly sustained; material facts about payment timing unresolved; estoppel not proven as a matter of law
Extra-contractual claims viability after contract estoppel Hall: extra-contractual claims survive if contract claims survive Germania: without contract breach, no extra-contractual claims Remanded; summary judgment reversed to permit record development on extra-contractual claims

Key Cases Cited

  • State Farm Lloyds v. Johnson, 290 S.W.3d 886 (Tex. 2009) (enforceability of appraisal clauses; time to pay not strictly defined by clause)
  • Hennessey v. Vanguard Ins. Co., 895 S.W.2d 794 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1995) (estoppel as an affirmative contract-based defense; requires proof of elements)
  • Garcia v. State Farm Lloyds, 514 S.W.3d 257 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2016) (appraisal as binding; estoppel considerations)
  • Moore v. Dilworth, 179 S.W.2d 942 (Tex. 1944) (implied reasonable time for payment when not specified)
  • Cross Timbers Oil Co. v. Exxon Corp., 22 S.W.3d 24 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2000) (cannot rewrite contract to fix provisions not included)
  • Scottish Union & Nat’l Ins. Co. v. Clancy, 8 S.W. 630 (Tex. 1888) (appraisal results binding; damages calculated per contract)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Christopher Hall v. Germania Farm Mutual Insurance Association
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 13, 2017
Docket Number: 07-16-00304-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.