midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
52 F.4th 1172
9th Cir.
2022
Read the full case

Background:

  • In 2014 a $256,075.95 judgment lien (Greek Village lien) was recorded against Dejan Boskoski’s Carlsbad, CA home.
  • Boskoski filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy in August 2021; the home became part of the bankruptcy estate but he claimed a California homestead exemption.
  • California’s homestead exemption statute increased between 2014 and 2021; in 2014 the applicable maximum for a married debtor was $100,000, and by 2021 the statute provided up to $600,000 (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §704.730).
  • Bankruptcy Code §522(f)(1) permits avoidance of a lien to the extent it "impairs an exemption to which the debtor would have been entitled," with impairment measured per §522(f)(2)(A).
  • Trustee Barclay argued the 2014 exemption amount controls under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §703.050(a); Boskoski argued the Bankruptcy Code requires using the exemption he would have had but for the lien at the petition date (2021).
  • The bankruptcy court applied the 2021 $600,000 exemption and avoided the entire Greek Village lien; the Ninth Circuit affirmed.

Issues:

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether §522(f) requires using the state exemption amount as of the bankruptcy filing (petition date) or as of the lien creation date when determining lien impairment Boskoski: use exemption debtor "would have been entitled" absent the lien at the filing date (apply 2021 $600,000) Barclay: apply California law fixing the exemption at the time the judgment lien was created (apply 2014 $100,000) Court: §522(f) requires computing the exemption the debtor would have had but for the lien; apply state exemption law as of the bankruptcy filing date (2021 $600,000); lien avoided in full

Key Cases Cited

  • Owen v. Owen, 500 U.S. 305 (U.S. 1991) ("would have been entitled" test requires ignoring lien and assessing the hypothetical exemption)
  • White v. Stump, 266 U.S. 310 (U.S. 1924) ("snapshot rule": exemptions are fixed as of the petition date)
  • In re Jacobson, 676 F.3d 1193 (9th Cir. 2012) (state-law exemptions generally determined by law applicable on filing date)
  • Klein v. Anderson (In re Anderson), 988 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir. 2021) (standard of review for bankruptcy court legal conclusions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: CHRISTOPHER BARCLAY V. DEJAN BOSKOSKI
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 14, 2022
Citations: 52 F.4th 1172; 22-55098
Docket Number: 22-55098
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In