Cheung v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
15-741
| Fed. Cl. | Apr 20, 2017Background
- Petitioner Candace Cheung filed a Vaccine Act petition on July 16, 2015, alleging her minor child A.N. developed idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) from an August 2, 2012 MMR vaccination (and possibly concomitant vaccines).
- The parties executed a stipulation and Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey issued a decision awarding compensation on October 20, 2016.
- On November 22, 2016, petitioner moved for attorneys’ fees and costs requesting $20,086.50 in fees and $8,464.71 in costs, totaling $28,551.21; counsel reported no client out-of-pocket expenses.
- Respondent filed a response stating she need not be involved in fee dispute resolution but agreed the statutory criteria for an award were satisfied and deferred to the Special Master’s discretion on amount.
- The Special Master reviewed billing records, found the requested hours and rates reasonable, and granted the full requested amount.
- The award was ordered as a lump sum check payable jointly to petitioner and her counsel; the decision noted the award covers all legal fees and advanced costs and that counsel may not collect additional fees.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether petitioner is entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs under the Vaccine Act | Cheung sought an award under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa‑15(e) following a successful stipulation-based entitlement decision | Respondent acknowledged she has no formal role in fee resolution but agreed statutory requirements for fees and costs were met | Fees and costs are allowed; statutory requirements satisfied |
| Whether the requested amounts (hours and rates) are reasonable | Petitioner provided billing records and requested $28,551.21 total | Respondent deferred to Special Master’s discretion, raising no objection to reasonableness | Special Master reviewed records and found hours and rates reasonable; awarded full amount |
| Form and recipient of the award | Petitioner requested payment to counsel/petitioner | Respondent offered no opposing position | Award ordered as lump sum check jointly payable to petitioner and counsel |
| Whether the award covers all legal expenses and bars additional charges | Petitioner accepted that award should cover all legal fees and costs | Respondent cited statute preventing additional collection by counsel | Special Master confirmed award encompasses all fees, advanced costs, and bars further collection by counsel |
Key Cases Cited
- Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (establishes that an attorney may not collect fees in addition to the amount awarded under the Vaccine Act)
