Chase Carmen Hunter v. Texas Department of Insurance and David Mattax, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Insurance, 03-14-00737-CV

Hunter, a Virginia resident with an inactive Texas license, filed a Pet DJ and related motions in 2013 in Travis County seeking declaratory relief and challenging TDI actions.
Clerk Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza allegedly refused to docket, index, or provide customary services to Hunter under TRCP 145(a) due to indigency.
Judge Dietz allegedly refused to act on Hunter’s motions and to advance the case, contributing to a dismissal for want of prosecution.
Hunter’s Motions sought reinstatement, court-ordered ministerial duties by the Clerk, service of process, and transfer of the case to the Court of Appeals.
Hunter attempted to participate by mail, fax, and direct filings to judges, culminating in a 2014 dismissal and later petitions for mandamus/prohibition.

Issue	Plaintiff's Argument	Defendant's Argument	Held
Clerk and court failed ministerial duties under TRCP 145(a).	Hunter	K Mendoza/J Diaz?	Not stated in provided excerpt.
Clerk failed to docket and process the petition after indigency affidavit.	Hunter	Mendoza/Clerk	Not stated in provided excerpt.
Judge Dietz failed to respond to motions and to advance the case post-dismissal.	Hunter	Dietz	Not stated in provided excerpt.
Whether TRCP 165a(3) requires a hearing on a Motion to Reinstate.	Hunter	Court/Clerk	Not stated in provided excerpt.
Whether the relief sought should be transferred to the Court of Appeals for adjudication.	Hunter	Appellees	Not stated in provided excerpt.

Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385 (U.S. 1926) (due process notice standard)
Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 (U.S. 1972) (due process; avoid arbitrary enforcement)
In re Bernard, 993 S.W.2d 453 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999) (proceedings involving ministerial duties and mandamus)