History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chase Bank, USA v. Curren
946 N.E.2d 810
Ohio Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Chase Bank sued Curren for a credit-card debt; balance claimed was $10,385.53 with additional interest and costs.
  • The trial court granted Chase summary judgment for $10,385.53, $971.98 interest through Aug 28, 2008, 8% post-judgment interest, and costs.
  • Curren argued Chase failed to provide admissible, personal-knowledge evidence and proper authentication of attached documents.
  • Chase submitted an affidavit from its agent Alcaraz with attached account statements and a credit-card application as exhibits.
  • Curren contended Alcaraz’s affidavit lacked personal knowledge and the attached statements were inadmissible hearsay under Evid.R. 803(6); the trial court admitted them anyway.
  • The appellate court reversed, holding the affidavit and statements were not properly authenticated or admissible, and the balance could not be calculated without admissible evidence; remanded for further proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Alcaraz’s affidavit and attached statements were admissible Chase argues affidavit suffices; statements show Curren’s balance Alcaraz lacks personal knowledge; statements are hearsay Affidavit/statements inadmissible; trial court abused its discretion
Whether Chase met its initial summary-judgment burden with admissible evidence Affidavit and exhibits establish balance No admissible evidence to calculate balance No summary judgment where admissible balance evidence lacking
Whether Curren’s arguments on charges and interest render chute to trial moot Issues are intertwined with balance calculation Disputed charges; issues require factual resolution Remand; moot status of some arguments acknowledged after reversal

Key Cases Cited

  • Crown Asset Mgt., L.L.C. v. Gaul, 2009-Ohio-2167 (Ohio App.3d 2009) (account must show provable balance and proper running total)
  • Asset Acceptance Corp. v. Proctor, 156 Ohio App.3d 60 (Ohio 2004) (account must show balance and itemized charges; admissibility matters)
  • Proctor v. Hall, 2006-Ohio-2228 (Ohio App.5th 2006) (business-records foundation for 803(6) evidence)
  • State v. Davis, 62 Ohio St.3d 326 (Ohio 1991) (requires authentication of business records; personal knowledge for custodian)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Chase Bank, USA v. Curren
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 21, 2010
Citation: 946 N.E.2d 810
Docket Number: 10CA2
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.