Charles Ryan Ermisch and Julia A. Ermisch v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for Deutsche Alt-A Securities Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2007-1
03-16-00080-CV
Tex. App.Nov 4, 2016Background
- Charles and Julie Ermisch purchased property in 2007; executed note and deed of trust; deed assigned to HSBC and property foreclosed in 2012.
- HSBC filed a forcible-detainer action after sending a notice to vacate; justice court awarded possession and the Ermisches appealed to the county court at law.
- HSBC moved for traditional summary judgment and attached a business-records affidavit from Sharon Vaughn (paralegal and records custodian) authenticating four documents (deed of trust, assignment, substitute trustee’s deed, notice to vacate).
- Vaughn’s affidavit stated she had “personal knowledge” and that the facts were “true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.”
- The Ermisches objected that the affidavit was insufficient because it did not state the facts were unequivocally “true and correct”; the trial court granted summary judgment without ruling on that specific objection; the Ermisches’ motion for new trial was overruled by operation of law.
- On appeal, the court considered (1) whether the objection was preserved and (2) whether Vaughn’s affidavit met the evidentiary requirements for admitting business records under the rules.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether trial court erred by admitting Vaughn’s business-records affidavit and attached records because affidavit said "to the best of my knowledge and belief" rather than unqualified "true and correct" | Ermisches: affidavit language renders records inadmissible hearsay; insufficient authentication for summary judgment | HSBC: Ermisches waived error by not obtaining a ruling; affidavit substantially complied with Tex. R. Evid. 902(10)(b) and showed personal knowledge and custodian status | Court: Error not preserved for appeal because no ruling obtained; alternatively, affidavit was sufficient under Rules 902(10)(b)/803(6) and trial court did not abuse discretion; judgment affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- Grand Prairie Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Vaughan, 792 S.W.2d 944 (Tex. 1990) (preservation rule for evidentiary objections)
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238 (Tex. 1985) (abuse of discretion standard for evidentiary rulings)
- Owens–Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Malone, 972 S.W.2d 35 (Tex. 1998) (appellate deference where any legitimate basis supports trial court ruling)
- Kyle v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 232 S.W.3d 355 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007) (custodian affidavit sufficient when affiant’s role and job duties establish personal knowledge of record-keeping)
- Federal Fin. Co. v. Delgado, 1 S.W.3d 181 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1999) (affidavit need not recite the exact words "true and correct" if the affidavit demonstrates personal knowledge and the obvious effect is a claim of truth)
Outcome: Affirmed summary-judgment possession for HSBC; affidavit sufficient under business-records exception and objection not preserved.
