History
  • No items yet
midpage
511 S.W.3d 117
Tex. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Taylor sued Margo and Williams for injunctive relief under Texas Election Code §273.081.
  • Trial court dismissed with prejudice December 18, 2013 after pleas to jurisdiction; counterclaims reserved.
  • January 16, 2014 modified order dismissed claims with prejudice and reserved counterclaims for later; superseded December 18 order.
  • Taylor filed a February 14, 2014 notice of appeal claiming to appeal the December 18 order.
  • Margo/Williams moved to dismiss as untimely and argued it was unclear which order was being appealed; neither order was a final judgment for appeal purposes.
  • Court held only the January 16, 2014 order is appealable, corrected defect permitted by Rule 25.1(g); ordered an amended notice within 10 days; denied motion to reconsider.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness of appeal from January 16 order Taylor timely under Verburgt and Rule 26.3 Appeal untimely; misidentified order Appeal timely to be determined via amended notice
Amendment to notice of appeal allowed under Rule 25.1(g) Amendment permitted to correct defects Amendment cannot shift to a different order Amendment permitted to correct defect; misidentification cured by amendment
Which order is subject to appeal January 16 order is final and appealable December 18 order was the judgment January 16, 2014 order is the sole appealable order; December 18 is superseded

Key Cases Cited

  • Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. 2001) (final-judgment timing; accelerated appeals)
  • Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615 (Tex. 1997) (extension of time for filing appeals)
  • Sweed v. Nye, 323 S.W.3d 873 (Tex. 2010) (amendments to notice of appeal for defects allowed)
  • Lefton v. Griffith, 136 S.W.3d 271 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 2004) (amendment to notice of appeal for defects permitted)
  • Rainbow Group, Ltd. v. Wagoner, 219 S.W.3d 485 (Tex.App.—Austin 2007) (amendment cannot add a different appealable order)
  • City of San Antonio v. Rodriguez, 828 S.W.2d 417 (Tex. 1992) (amendment for defects; certain corrections allowed)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Charles N. Taylor, Jr. v. Dee Margo, in His Individual and Official Capacities and Michael Williams, in His Individual and Official Capacities
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jun 25, 2014
Citations: 511 S.W.3d 117; 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 6898; 2014 WL 2881567; 08-14-00066-CV
Docket Number: 08-14-00066-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
Log In
    Charles N. Taylor, Jr. v. Dee Margo, in His Individual and Official Capacities and Michael Williams, in His Individual and Official Capacities, 511 S.W.3d 117