History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chad T.B. Steiner v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
79A05-1606-CR-1544
| Ind. Ct. App. | Jan 31, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • In Jan 2016 police searched Chad T.B. Steiner’s home and seized his computer, finding videos and photographs of child pornography, including a video labeled “km8b.wmv.”
  • Evidence showed Steiner exchanged child-pornography images or gallery passwords with at least 25 email addresses between Jan–Nov 2015, ran galleries on Image Source (95 photos) and primejailbait.com (108 photos, 40,000+ views), and posted images over multiple years (account created Jan 2013).
  • Steiner was charged with level 5 child exploitation and two counts of level 6 possession of child pornography; he pled guilty to the level 5 count and one level 6 count (the km8b.wmv video) under a plea agreement; one count was dismissed.
  • At sentencing the trial court found mitigating factors: guilty plea, acceptance of responsibility, lack of criminal history, and family/friend support; it found aggravators: multiple victims, victim recommendation for an aggravated sentence, and a prolonged course of conduct.
  • The court imposed concurrent terms: four years (level 5) and 1.5 years (level 6) with three years executed, one year suspended. Steiner appealed, arguing the court abused its discretion by omitting mitigating factors (remorse, work history) and by relying on improper aggravators.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court abused discretion by failing to find remorse as a mitigating factor State: trial court implicitly accepted acceptance of responsibility; no error Steiner: court failed to find remorse separately Court: acceptance of responsibility sufficed; remorse was effectively found or properly discredited — no abuse of discretion
Whether the trial court abused discretion by failing to find work history as a mitigating factor State: employment evidence in PSI was minimal; no clear support for long-term employment Steiner: argued 20 years at same job merited mitigation Court: record lacked support for claimed 20-year employment; no abuse in omitting work history as mitigator
Whether the trial court improperly used “course of conduct/period of time” as an aggravator State: evidence showed multi-year activity and postings predating arrest Steiner: claimed temporal scope was within charged period and inherent in offense Court: multi-year posting, galleries since 2013 and exchanges with many addresses supported finding of prolonged conduct — valid aggravator
Whether multiple victims was an improper aggravator because it’s inherent in the charges State: evidence showed distinct victims from different jurisdictions and numerous images Steiner: contended multiplicity was inherent in offenses Court: distinct victims and numerous postings supported multiple-victims aggravator — valid

Key Cases Cited

  • Anglemyer v. State, 868 N.E.2d 482 (Ind. 2007) (standard for appellate review of sentencing and when a trial court abuses discretion)
  • Sandleben v. State, 29 N.E.3d 126 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015) (trial court’s credibility determinations at sentencing will be accepted absent impermissible considerations)
  • Healey v. State, 969 N.E.2d 607 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (principles governing appellate review of alleged sentencing errors)
  • Espinoza v. State, 859 N.E.2d 375 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006) (employment history in PSI alone may be insufficient to establish a mitigating factor)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Chad T.B. Steiner v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 31, 2017
Docket Number: 79A05-1606-CR-1544
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.